From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:19:48 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 01/10] perl: new package In-Reply-To: <1345452909-15756-1-git-send-email-francois.perrad@gadz.org> References: <1345452909-15756-1-git-send-email-francois.perrad@gadz.org> Message-ID: <20120821131948.5e59085b@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello Fran?ois, Le Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:55:00 +0200, Francois Perrad a ?crit : > --- > package/Config.in | 1 + > package/perl/Config.in | 16 +++++ > package/perl/perl-Makefile-SH.patch | 28 ++++++++ > package/perl/perl-configure-qemu.patch | 22 +++++++ > package/perl/perl-fix-minitest.patch | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > package/perl/perl-make-ext.patch | 35 ++++++++++ > package/perl/perl-mkppport.patch | 36 ++++++++++ > package/perl/perl.mk | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 8 files changed, 346 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 package/perl/Config.in > create mode 100644 package/perl/perl-Makefile-SH.patch > create mode 100644 package/perl/perl-configure-qemu.patch > create mode 100644 package/perl/perl-fix-minitest.patch > create mode 100644 package/perl/perl-make-ext.patch > create mode 100644 package/perl/perl-mkppport.patch > create mode 100644 package/perl/perl.mk Thanks for this work on Perl. However, I find it lacks a bit of background information. What is your patch series doing? Why would we want to have three separate packages for Perl (perl, miniperl and microperl)? We need some details to understand what you're proposing. Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com