From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
To: Kai Makisara <Kai.Makisara@kolumbus.fi>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: request size limit in scsi tape driver
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 15:10:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120823131022.GA17206@aepfle.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1208202133500.5250@kai.makisara.local>
On Mon, Aug 20, Kai Makisara wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Olaf Hering wrote:
>
> >
> > Currently the st driver does not to break up write requests into smaller
> > chunks to satisfy the ->max_hw_sectors limit of the underlying host driver.
> >
> > # modprobe -v scsi_debug ptype=1 opts=1 dev_size_mb=123
> > # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/st0 bs=$((1024*54321))
> >
> > This leads to -EBUSY from this call chain:
> > st_write -> st_do_scsi -> st_scsi_execute -> blk_rq_map_user
> >
> > What is the reason for this behaviour?
> > Should st_write write in smaller chunks, or would that break real
> > hardware because they expect certain block sizes?
> >
> In variable block mode the write() byte count determines the size of the
> tape block. Exactly one SCSI command is used to write one block. This is
> why the writes can't be split in variable block mode. In fixed block mode
> the writes are split but this results in several tape blocks for each
> write().
Thats very unfortunate.
Would it be possible in theory to split and reassemble the SCSI commands
in backend/frontend to overcome this protocol limit in pvscsi?
Olaf
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-23 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-20 15:50 request size limit in scsi tape driver Olaf Hering
2012-08-20 18:44 ` Kai Makisara
2012-08-23 13:10 ` Olaf Hering [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120823131022.GA17206@aepfle.de \
--to=olaf@aepfle.de \
--cc=Kai.Makisara@kolumbus.fi \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.