From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Davies Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Windows slow boot: contractor wanted Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:51:27 +0100 Message-ID: <20120825175127.GB8619@alpha.arachsys.com> References: <5030F273.5080706@redhat.com> <20120820135656.GA16676@alpha.arachsys.com> <50334E13.8020100@redhat.com> <20120821152107.GA16363@alpha.arachsys.com> <5034A18B.5040408@redhat.com> <20120822124032.GA12647@alpha.arachsys.com> <5034D437.8070106@redhat.com> <20120822144150.GA1400@alpha.arachsys.com> <5034F24D.1090105@redhat.com> <20120822172258.GF7722@us.grid.coop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Avi Kivity , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Troy Benjegerdes Return-path: Received: from alpha.arachsys.com ([91.203.57.7]:36667 "EHLO alpha.arachsys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754388Ab2HYRvc (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Aug 2012 13:51:32 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120822172258.GF7722@us.grid.coop> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Troy Benjegerdes wrote: > Is there a way to capture/reproduce this 'slow boot' behavior with > a simple regression test? I'd like to know if it happens on a > single-physical CPU socket machine, or just on dual-sockets. Yes, definitely. These two emails earlier in the thread give a fairly complete description of what I am doing - please do ask any further questions? http://marc.info/?l=qemu-devel&m=134511429415347 http://marc.info/?l=qemu-devel&m=134520701317153 Richard. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47166) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T5KWB-0004YO-W4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 13:51:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T5KWA-00026i-Vf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 13:51:31 -0400 Received: from alpha.arachsys.com ([91.203.57.7]:48862) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T5KWA-00026e-Pk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 13:51:30 -0400 Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:51:27 +0100 From: Richard Davies Message-ID: <20120825175127.GB8619@alpha.arachsys.com> References: <5030F273.5080706@redhat.com> <20120820135656.GA16676@alpha.arachsys.com> <50334E13.8020100@redhat.com> <20120821152107.GA16363@alpha.arachsys.com> <5034A18B.5040408@redhat.com> <20120822124032.GA12647@alpha.arachsys.com> <5034D437.8070106@redhat.com> <20120822144150.GA1400@alpha.arachsys.com> <5034F24D.1090105@redhat.com> <20120822172258.GF7722@us.grid.coop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120822172258.GF7722@us.grid.coop> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Windows slow boot: contractor wanted List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Troy Benjegerdes Cc: Avi Kivity , kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Troy Benjegerdes wrote: > Is there a way to capture/reproduce this 'slow boot' behavior with > a simple regression test? I'd like to know if it happens on a > single-physical CPU socket machine, or just on dual-sockets. Yes, definitely. These two emails earlier in the thread give a fairly complete description of what I am doing - please do ask any further questions? http://marc.info/?l=qemu-devel&m=134511429415347 http://marc.info/?l=qemu-devel&m=134520701317153 Richard.