From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.saout.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.saout.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id azASwpQx5X_s for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 20:59:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.171]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 20:59:46 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 20:59:44 +0200 From: Heinz Diehl Message-ID: <20120825185944.GA2560@fancy-poultry.org> References: <20120825112041.GA28890@tansi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] How to recover partially overwritten LUKS volume? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de On 25.08.2012, Andr=E1s Korn wrote:=20 > Would it make sense to try a luksFormat with the same passphrase? I > suppose not, because a random key is likely involved...? The passphrase is used to unlock the master key, which is _not_ derived from the passphrase. So it makes no sense at all, but will destroy your header.