From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Virtualizing /proc/sys/kernel/random/boot_id per container ?
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:18:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120830211832.GA3297@redhat.com> (raw)
One of the features that SystemD folks have asked us to fix in LXC, is
to make sure that /proc/sys/kernel/random/boot_id changes each time a
container is started.
The current semantics are that this file produces a new random UUID each
time the host OS is booted. Obviously each time we start a container now,
they just see the host's random boot_id, so from a container's POV this
does not change each time it starts.
There seems to be general agreement that, aside from the PID directories,
changes to data in proc should be done by a FUSE filesystem overlay of
some kind. We could use that mechanism to fix 'boot_id' in userspace, but
I'm wondering if this is a better candidate for dealing with in kernel
space, since as well as the /proc/sys tree, the data is also visible via
the sysctl() system call which a FUSE overlay won't address.
The kernel doesn't have a real concept of a 'container' to associate
a boot_id value with as such, but maybe it is reasonable to associate
a boot_id value with each PID namespace ?
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
next reply other threads:[~2012-08-30 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-30 21:18 Daniel P. Berrange [this message]
[not found] ` <20120830211832.GA3297-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-30 22:15 ` Virtualizing /proc/sys/kernel/random/boot_id per container ? Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <878vcwjabu.fsf-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-30 22:50 ` Daniel P. Berrange
[not found] ` <20120830225002.GA9226-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-31 0:13 ` Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <87bohrhqai.fsf-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-03 7:56 ` Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <5044629C.3030909-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-03 19:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <87r4qi6g6k.fsf-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-04 8:42 ` Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <5045BF05.9050707-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-04 9:16 ` Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <5045C707.9020001-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-04 9:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-09-04 9:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <878vcq5ekx.fsf-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-04 12:08 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-09-04 15:28 ` Serge Hallyn
2012-09-04 14:44 ` Serge Hallyn
2012-09-04 14:45 ` Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <50461421.7030305-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-04 15:25 ` Serge Hallyn
2012-09-04 15:31 ` Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <50461EBB.2050501-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-04 17:18 ` Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20120904171818.GA5334-7LNsyQBKDXoIagZqoN9o3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-04 19:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <87vcft1shu.fsf-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-05 12:10 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-09-05 7:59 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-30 23:22 ` Daniel P. Berrange
[not found] ` <20120830232239.GE9226-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-31 0:18 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-08-31 13:25 ` Serge Hallyn
2012-09-03 7:53 ` Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <504461F1.1090400-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-04 14:42 ` Serge Hallyn
2012-09-03 7:52 ` Glauber Costa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120830211832.GA3297@redhat.com \
--to=berrange-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.