From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vms173019pub.verizon.net (vms173019pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.19]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2A4EE00533 for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 15:48:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [72.66.25.115]) by vms173019.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0M9P007720NQVX60@vms173019.mailsrvcs.net> for meta-ti@yoctoproject.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 17:48:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B092F201AF; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 18:47:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 18:47:50 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: "Cooper Jr., Franklin" Message-id: <20120901224750.GD11821@denix.org> References: <8F29D6B095ED194EA1980491A5E029710C2B2B46@DFLE09.ent.ti.com> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <8F29D6B095ED194EA1980491A5E029710C2B2B46@DFLE09.ent.ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: "meta-ti@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Fix image recipes in meta-ti X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 22:48:25 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 09:07:31PM +0000, Cooper Jr., Franklin wrote: > When debugging issues in meta-arago I frequently try building recipes using > the meta-ti,meta-oe and oe-core layers. However, I always have to remove the > following recipes due to "This recipe does not have the LICENSE field set" > error: > cloud9-gfx-image.bb > cloud9-gnome-image.bb > cloud9-image.bb FWIW, meta-arago explicitly masks those recipes, so you shouldn't be having those errors or have to remove the recipes: http://arago-project.org/git/?p=meta-arago.git;a=blob;f=meta-arago-distro/conf/distro/arago.conf;hb=HEAD#l2 Also, it was discussed here just few days ago: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-ti/2012-August/001456.html > The issue is these recipes have an include from meta-angstrom that provides > this LICENSE field. Meta-ti should not have this dependency so these recipes > should be fixed to address this. I personally do not think cloud9 related > recipes that install cloud9, nodejs, mplayer etc.. should even be in > meta-ti which is a BSP layer but that is a completely different discussion. > I also don't believe pulling in the include file that is needed from > meta-angstrom is also a reasonably solution. Either these recipes need to be > fixed so that they can work in meta-ti with only a dependency on meta-oe and > oe-core. Or remove the recipes from this layer and pull it into > meta-angstrom which I believe is the best option. So, what do you propose? ;) Or you just volunteering to be in the middle of a flame war by raising this hard issue? -- Denys