All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] uprobes: Xol should send SIGTRAP if X86_EFLAGS_TF was set
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 17:26:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120903152616.GA9081@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120903152525.GA9028@redhat.com>

arch_uprobe_disable_step() correctly preserves X86_EFLAGS_TF and
returns to user-mode. But this means the application gets SIGTRAP
only after the next insn.

This means that UPROBE_CLEAR_TF logic is not really right. _enable
should only record the state of X86_EFLAGS_TF, and _disable should
check it separately from UPROBE_FIX_SETF.

Remove arch_uprobe_task->restore_flags, add ->saved_tf instead, and
change enable/disable accordingly.

arch_uprobe_skip_sstep() logic has the same problem, change it to
check X86_EFLAGS_TF and send SIGTRAP as well. We will cleanup this
all after we fold enable/disable_step into pre/post_hol hooks.

Note: send_sig(SIGTRAP) is not actually right, we need send_sigtrap().
But this needs more changes, handle_swbp() does the same and this is
equally wrong.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/uprobes.h |    3 +--
 arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c      |   19 +++++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uprobes.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uprobes.h
index cee5862..d561ff5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uprobes.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uprobes.h
@@ -46,8 +46,7 @@ struct arch_uprobe_task {
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 	unsigned long			saved_scratch_register;
 #endif
-#define UPROBE_CLEAR_TF			(1 << 0)
-	unsigned int			restore_flags;
+	unsigned int			saved_tf;
 };
 
 extern int  arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
index 3b4aae6..7e993d1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
@@ -653,7 +653,7 @@ void arch_uprobe_abort_xol(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
  * Skip these instructions as per the currently known x86 ISA.
  * 0x66* { 0x90 | 0x0f 0x1f | 0x0f 0x19 | 0x87 0xc0 }
  */
-bool arch_uprobe_skip_sstep(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
+static bool __skip_sstep(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	int i;
 
@@ -681,16 +681,21 @@ bool arch_uprobe_skip_sstep(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	return false;
 }
 
+bool arch_uprobe_skip_sstep(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	bool ret = __skip_sstep(auprobe, regs);
+	if (ret && (regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_TF))
+		send_sig(SIGTRAP, current, 0);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 void arch_uprobe_enable_step(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe)
 {
 	struct task_struct *task = current;
 	struct arch_uprobe_task	*autask	= &task->utask->autask;
 	struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(task);
 
-	autask->restore_flags = 0;
-	if (!(regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_TF) &&
-	    !(auprobe->fixups & UPROBE_FIX_SETF))
-		autask->restore_flags |= UPROBE_CLEAR_TF;
+	autask->saved_tf = !!(regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_TF);
 
 	regs->flags |= X86_EFLAGS_TF;
 	if (test_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_BLOCKSTEP))
@@ -707,6 +712,8 @@ void arch_uprobe_disable_step(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe)
 	 * SIGTRAP if we do not clear TF. We need to examine the opcode to
 	 * make it right.
 	 */
-	if (autask->restore_flags & UPROBE_CLEAR_TF)
+	if (autask->saved_tf)
+		send_sig(SIGTRAP, task, 0);
+	else if (!(auprobe->fixups & UPROBE_FIX_SETF))
 		regs->flags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_TF;
 }
-- 
1.5.5.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-03 15:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-03 15:25 [PATCH 0/7] uprobes: single-step fixes Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-03 15:25 ` [PATCH 1/7] uprobes: Introduce arch_uprobe_enable/disable_step() Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-07 14:57   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-03 15:26 ` [PATCH 2/7] uprobes: x86: Implement x86 specific arch_uprobe_*_step Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-07 14:59   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-03 15:26 ` [PATCH 3/7] ptrace: Introduce set_task_blockstep() helper Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-07 15:00   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-03 15:26 ` [PATCH 4/7] ptrace: Partly fix set_task_blockstep()->update_debugctlmsr() logic Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-07 15:14   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-10 16:57   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-09-10 17:45     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-10 17:27   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-03 15:26 ` [PATCH 5/7] uprobes: Do not (ab)use TIF_SINGLESTEP/user_*_single_step() for single-stepping Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-07 15:11   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-07 15:50     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-08  7:49       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-03 15:26 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-09-12 12:08   ` [PATCH 6/7] uprobes: Xol should send SIGTRAP if X86_EFLAGS_TF was set Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-12 14:45     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-03 15:26 ` [PATCH 7/7] uprobes: Make arch_uprobe_task->saved_trap_nr "unsigned int" Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-12 12:27   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-08 17:06 ` [PATCH 0/7] uprobes: single-step fixes Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-12 12:33   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-08 17:06 ` [PATCH 8/7] uprobes: Fix arch_uprobe_disable_step() && UTASK_SSTEP_TRAPPED interaction Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-12 12:36   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-10 16:57 ` [PATCH 0/7] uprobes: single-step fixes Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120903152616.GA9081@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=anton@redhat.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=roland@hack.frob.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.