From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:45975 "EHLO mail-pz0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751032Ab2IDVXd (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Sep 2012 17:23:33 -0400 Received: by dady13 with SMTP id y13so4662219dad.19 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 14:23:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 14:21:01 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: srinivas pandruvada , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, jkosina@suse.cz Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] HID-Sensor v8 Message-ID: <20120904212101.GA2463@kroah.com> References: <1346082597-768-1-git-send-email-srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com> <503D1D4F.2030805@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <503D1D4F.2030805@kernel.org> Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 08:34:39PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > I am pretty happy with the whole series now, so next question from > my end is what route this takes into the kernel? > > Patch 1 should go through the IIO tree (as it touches > a fairly high churn area of the IIO core). > > 2-4 are very much in HID... > 5-9 very much IIO. > > My personal preference is to take the lot though the IIO tree > but then I know we have a few patches in the pipeline that will > touch this driver after it merges (internal api changes) and have > no idea what is going on from the HID side so naturally I full on > the side of least work for me :) > > Jiri what are you thoughts on this series? > > CC'd Greg given he's the one who will get the fishy pull request > from me if it goes though IIO... If Jiri says it is ok, that's fine with me, whatever works easier for you two. greg k-h