From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, eranian@google.com, mingo@elte.hu,
andi@firstfloor.org, avi@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86: Disable uncore on virtualized CPU.
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 20:52:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120905185233.GD16230@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120905063524.GA20710@gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 08:35:24AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > From: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
> >
> > Initializing uncore PMU on virtualized CPU may hang the kernel.
> > This is because kvm does not emulate the entire hardware. Thers
> > are lots of uncore related MSRs, making kvm enumerate them all
> > is a non-trival task. So just disable uncore on virtualized CPU.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
> > index 0a55710..2f005ba 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
> > @@ -2898,6 +2898,9 @@ static int __init intel_uncore_init(void)
> > if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL)
> > return -ENODEV;
> >
> > + if (cpu_has_hypervisor)
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > ret = uncore_pci_init();
> > if (ret)
> > goto fail;
>
> Cannot the presence of the uncore hardware be detected in a
> cleaner fashion, via the PCI config space and such?
Probably just by reading the registers and see that they are 0 and
when writing read back and check.
And the code should not hang when that happens, then this check wouldn't
be needed.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-05 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-21 9:08 [PATCH] perf/x86: Disable uncore on virtualized CPU Yan, Zheng
2012-08-21 12:55 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-08-31 7:12 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-08-21 14:31 ` Andi Kleen
2012-08-21 14:42 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-09-05 6:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-09-05 8:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-05 9:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-09-05 18:52 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2012-10-20 8:23 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/x86: Disable uncore on virtualized CPUs tip-bot for Yan, Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120905185233.GD16230@one.firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=zheng.z.yan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.