From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
eparis@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Check all returns from audit_log_start
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 11:47:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120906154749.GA27399@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACLa4pteVcrk0ZuhUDQOf=WMx1Odob5F+B=Y=Y3DT-mj9ZbQ6A@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:36:06AM -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Following on from the previous patch that fixed an oops, these
> > are all the other similar code patterns in the tree with the same
> > checks added. I never saw these causing problems, but checking
> > this everywhere seems to make more sense than every subsequent
> > routine that gets passed 'ab' having to check it.
> >
> > Later we could remove all those same checks from audit_log_format
> > and friends. For now, this just prevents similar bugs being introduced
> > as the one in my previous patch.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
>
> Not certain because I haven't looked at what happens with the error
> code, but I think this might not be right. auditd can be explictly
> told not to audit certain events, in which case it is normal and
> expected that ab would come back NULL....
Ugh, that's a lot messier to have to audit every function that gets
passed 'ab' to make sure it has a NULL check, but ok I'll go look at it.
hopefully audit_log_link_denied was a one off.
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-06 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-06 13:46 3.6-rc4 audit_log_d_path oops Dave Jones
2012-09-06 15:08 ` Check all returns from audit_log_start Dave Jones
2012-09-06 15:36 ` Eric Paris
2012-09-06 15:47 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2012-09-06 15:56 ` Dave Jones
2012-09-06 15:16 ` 3.6-rc4 audit_log_d_path oops Dave Jones
2012-09-06 15:34 ` Eric Paris
2012-09-06 16:32 ` Kees Cook
2012-09-06 16:45 ` Dave Jones
2012-09-06 17:50 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120906154749.GA27399@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.