From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.saout.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.saout.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xMh8Llz0LbR7 for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 00:45:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from awesome.dsw2k3.info (unknown [IPv6:2a01:198:661:1f::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 00:45:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by awesome.dsw2k3.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF3E7C017A for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 00:45:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from awesome.dsw2k3.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (awesome.dsw2k3.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N3qHtjjpcLPh for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 00:45:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from citd.de (pD9FF32CD.dip.t-dialin.net [217.255.50.205]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by awesome.dsw2k3.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 00:45:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 00:45:19 +0200 From: Matthias Schniedermeyer Message-ID: <20120908224519.GA9926@citd.de> References: <0970e8b6f714123c66b14c5bb1b79810@tenak.net> <20120908133525.GC23589@tansi.org> <20120908200221.GB31299@tansi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120908200221.GB31299@tansi.org> Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] No key available for this passphrase List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de On 08.09.2012 22:02, Arno Wagner wrote: > > You can have up to 8 with LUKS. Each gets it own key-slot. > Unfortunately, the key-slot with the highest risk to get > damaged is the first one and that is where a single passphrase > ends up in if you do not override the placement default. If that happens so often, why not change the default and place the first key in slot 8? (Assuming that can be done without significant compatibility issues) Bis denn -- Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.