From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Peter =?iso-8859-1?q?H=FCwe?= Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 21:17:20 +0200 References: <201209022245.20413.PeterHuewe@gmx.de> <201209091415.02460.PeterHuewe@gmx.de> <20120909204036.40f2217c@endymion.delvare> In-Reply-To: <20120909204036.40f2217c@endymion.delvare> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201209092117.20896.PeterHuewe@gmx.de> Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Emulate I2C subsystem/slaves To: Jean Delvare Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Richard Weinberger , user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-ID: Hi Jean, Am Sonntag, 9. September 2012, 20:40:36 schrieb Jean Delvare: > There is a problem with the mux chip drivers, which then no longer > depend on HAS_IOMEM. The selectables on my x86 and UML machine build fine ;) But you're correct, we should exclude/guard them. > Also, I think it is about time to admit that > i2c-stub does not fit under "I2C Hardware Bus support". It is a driver > for development, not hardware support. > > So I propose the following instead: > > drivers/i2c/Kconfig | 14 +++++++++++++- > drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig | 14 +------------- > drivers/i2c/muxes/Kconfig | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) I'm perfectly fine with this. Signed-off-by: Peter Huewe