From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: Add pinctrl-single,bits type of mux Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:49:55 -0700 Message-ID: <20120910184955.GB1303@atomide.com> References: <1346835718-21325-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <1346835718-21325-3-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Peter Ujfalusi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Linus Walleij [120910 00:11]: > On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > > > With pinctrl-single,bits it is possible to update just part of the register > > within the pinctrl-single,function-mask area. > > This is useful when one register configures mmore than one pin's mux. > > > > pinctrl-single,bits takes three parameters: > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi > > Do we have a conclusion on this patch 2/2? > > I'm holding it back until Tony explicitly ACKs it for now. I don't like the idea of mixing different types of controllers here, so let's wait a little bit on 2/2. Tony