From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP4: wakeupgen: remove duplicate AUXCOREBOOT* read/write Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:49:45 -0700 Message-ID: <20120911184945.GO23092@atomide.com> References: <20120910185535.GC1303@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.66]:37973 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758404Ab2IKSts (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:49:48 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Shilimkar, Santosh" Cc: linux-omap , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org * Shilimkar, Santosh [120911 00:20]: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > >> > On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: > >> > > >> >> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > >> >> > * Shilimkar, Santosh [120908 01:20]: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Will you able to pick up these couple of wakeupgen fixes from here or > >> >> >> do you want me to send you a pull request for 3.6-rc5/6 > >> >> > > >> >> > I can pick them into fixes-noncritical. But if the second one is > >> >> > a major bug for the -rc series, the patch should be describe what > >> >> > breaks (regression? oops?). > >> >> > > >> >> Fixes non critical is fine. No major issue without these patches. > >> > > >> > There's an ordering constraint though: Santosh's patch needs to go in > >> > first, then mine. > >> > > >> Its other way round ;-) > >> Mine I created after applying your change. > > > > The problem is that if my patch is applied first, then there will be a > > point after my patch where the AUXCOREBOOT1 register won't be saved, which > > might break PM. So the patches may need to be updated. > > > Good point. It's trivial to re-order them. > > Tony, > Updated patches in the end of the email. Also attached. Thanks applying into fixes-non-critical. Regards, Tony From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:49:45 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP4: wakeupgen: remove duplicate AUXCOREBOOT* read/write In-Reply-To: References: <20120910185535.GC1303@atomide.com> Message-ID: <20120911184945.GO23092@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Shilimkar, Santosh [120911 00:20]: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > >> > On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: > >> > > >> >> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > >> >> > * Shilimkar, Santosh [120908 01:20]: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Will you able to pick up these couple of wakeupgen fixes from here or > >> >> >> do you want me to send you a pull request for 3.6-rc5/6 > >> >> > > >> >> > I can pick them into fixes-noncritical. But if the second one is > >> >> > a major bug for the -rc series, the patch should be describe what > >> >> > breaks (regression? oops?). > >> >> > > >> >> Fixes non critical is fine. No major issue without these patches. > >> > > >> > There's an ordering constraint though: Santosh's patch needs to go in > >> > first, then mine. > >> > > >> Its other way round ;-) > >> Mine I created after applying your change. > > > > The problem is that if my patch is applied first, then there will be a > > point after my patch where the AUXCOREBOOT1 register won't be saved, which > > might break PM. So the patches may need to be updated. > > > Good point. It's trivial to re-order them. > > Tony, > Updated patches in the end of the email. Also attached. Thanks applying into fixes-non-critical. Regards, Tony