From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] cgroup: Assign subsystem IDs during compile time Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:08:21 -0700 Message-ID: <20120911210821.GB7677@google.com> References: <1347380774-9546-1-git-send-email-wagi@monom.org> <1347380774-9546-8-git-send-email-wagi@monom.org> <20120911210109.GZ7677@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=rXEA2ZdEovsHrx9grlPZCuS0ReyBdS9lep47W23p1PA=; b=Xe4AxWTkhYGRoX2XzhGPVKUEDtT87oNk7rMmVoZz/blgGc3FvTNSFWTXctliffVvP1 qBzHY+X319C2yRtKhdKJUbH4RgBZneXX9tLF05RedwKHev+8PgES9ZrlyI62lSe2NI9t 4Vqg4ycQwS5GVu5/3ztrfrx2fCLVObio3YDpCQ6zSfZ5UnA/rLr4KsEGcvmsGVRChnjW mXUcpjjvgdyK9DsTW64YBa7JFZ1GbzcF4UZyWq+YdTns/pPl4xOwiUD1tXnsCSfqM2pK XthN2MEzmSmYrY7gnYeqnp0vcRbeRArGIl7QgRn66RSmIpwKn/8VzhfYIukvGgHiRRoj pRjA== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120911210109.GZ7677-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Daniel Wagner Cc: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Daniel Wagner , "David S. Miller" , Andrew Morton , Eric Dumazet , Gao feng , Glauber Costa , Jamal Hadi Salim , John Fastabend , Kamezawa Hiroyuki , Li Zefan , Neil Horman On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 02:01:09PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > For example, it's not evident the above is correct and it's burried > with all other changes. Can't we just assign the fixed subsys ID to > net_prio_subsys_id in this patch? This patch would be correct without > any netprio changes, no? Oops, that was wrong. net_prio_subsys_id itself becomes constant. Let's please better explain why the RCU trick removal is safe then. Thanks. -- tejun