From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the thermal tree Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:13:51 -0700 Message-ID: <20120912161351.GD7273@kroah.com> References: <20120912155231.716530c364bb20bd43efec0d@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:53232 "EHLO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759809Ab2ILQNx (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:13:53 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120912155231.716530c364bb20bd43efec0d@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eduardo Valentin , Zhang Rui On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 03:52:31PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in > drivers/staging/omap-thermal/omap-thermal-common.c between commit > 76f726fb24bd ("Thermal: Remove tc1/tc2 in generic thermal layer") from > the thermal tree and commit 765a1939a364 ("staging: omap-thermal: fix > polling period settings") from the staging tree. > > I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary > (no action is required). > Looks good to me, thanks. greg k-h