From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] cgroup: Assign subsystem IDs during compile time Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 11:56:36 -0700 Message-ID: <20120912185636.GR7677@google.com> References: <1347459128-32236-1-git-send-email-wagi@monom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=abOkS6dL9L4sku7/GZl8xG6xIG3Z6BuW4e7i0zoT+Po=; b=h4LO0+EcAEaeA2CJ6QHi6hBmfjvy/7EWGNO08MlOsu3amNVd0n5CAmQKQA5Ng7sfkd YBPZtRL2kmwKl3ncHJhUzdi9YYxhyk5AIpwkRmHeYcnMhISuKKgKP8DOaXmgQktCKQsc P/aALgZEKAdhNz3QAp3IwKGz8/WFKlHyq4hHzOaNOSW1VQoQsysR5Y9kBASXet31DUN9 aKZqbEXh4T8rzBz+UY8kf0IDjl4TyV6SaHrSL5OlslB2zmB3F+1TMhNIbFf7NS1OcaA1 bvjhq9fKXoJnXoq0x81pXgVbZP5Ix5iMVaaUgr/5lZcZiYxvY6SWQnsM/0UFar7XRx4R zX3A== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1347459128-32236-1-git-send-email-wagi-kQCPcA+X3s7YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Daniel Wagner Cc: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Daniel Wagner , "David S. Miller" , "Paul E. McKenney" , Andrew Morton , Eric Dumazet , Gao feng , Glauber Costa , Herbert Xu , Jamal Hadi Salim , John Fastabend , Kamezawa Hiroyuki , Li Zefan , Neil Horman On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 04:12:00PM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote: > From: Daniel Wagner > > Hi, > > I've removed the useless test in patch #4 and updated the commit message > on patch #7. > > While rewriting the commit message #7 I realized the pointer check was > completely wrong. Instead testing the return value of > task_subsys_state() I tested the pointer return by container_of. For > more details on this see the commit message. > > Because of this I added Herbert and Paul to the Cc list. Please have > close look at my rambling on the RCU part in patch #7. Thanks a lot! > > This series is against > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/cgroup.git for-3.7 All look good to me. Li, can you please review this? Herbert, can you please confirm the synchronize_rcu() removal in patch 7? Once Li review it, I'll route the series through cgroup/for-3.7. Thanks. -- tejun