From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, xiantao.zhang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kvm/fpu: Enable fully eager restore kvm FPU
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:26:36 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120913162636.GA10191@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1347437424-3006-1-git-send-email-xudong.hao@intel.com>
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 04:10:24PM +0800, Xudong Hao wrote:
> Enable KVM FPU fully eager restore, if there is other FPU state which isn't
> tracked by CR0.TS bit.
>
> v3 changes from v2:
> - Make fpu active explicitly while guest xsave is enabling and non-lazy xstate bit
> exist.
How about a "guest_xcr0_can_lazy_saverestore" bool to control this?
It only needs to be updated when guest xcr0 is updated.
That seems cleaner. Avi?
> v2 changes from v1:
> - Expand KVM_XSTATE_LAZY to 64 bits before negating it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm.h | 4 ++++
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 2 ++
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm.h
> index 521bf25..4c27056 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> #include <linux/ioctl.h>
> +#include <asm/user.h>
> +#include <asm/xsave.h>
>
> /* Select x86 specific features in <linux/kvm.h> */
> #define __KVM_HAVE_PIT
> @@ -30,6 +32,8 @@
> /* Architectural interrupt line count. */
> #define KVM_NR_INTERRUPTS 256
>
> +#define KVM_XSTATE_LAZY (XSTATE_FP | XSTATE_SSE | XSTATE_YMM)
> +
> struct kvm_memory_alias {
> __u32 slot; /* this has a different namespace than memory slots */
> __u32 flags;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index 248c2b4..853e875 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -3028,6 +3028,8 @@ static void vmx_set_cr0(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr0)
>
> if (!vcpu->fpu_active)
> hw_cr0 |= X86_CR0_TS | X86_CR0_MP;
> + else
> + hw_cr0 &= ~(X86_CR0_TS | X86_CR0_MP);
>
> vmcs_writel(CR0_READ_SHADOW, cr0);
> vmcs_writel(GUEST_CR0, hw_cr0);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 20f2266..183cf60 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -560,6 +560,8 @@ int __kvm_set_xcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 xcr)
> return 1;
> if (xcr0 & ~host_xcr0)
> return 1;
> + if (xcr0 & ~((u64)KVM_XSTATE_LAZY))
> + vcpu->fpu_active = 1;
> vcpu->arch.xcr0 = xcr0;
> vcpu->guest_xcr0_loaded = 0;
> return 0;
> @@ -5969,7 +5971,18 @@ void kvm_put_guest_fpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> vcpu->guest_fpu_loaded = 0;
> fpu_save_init(&vcpu->arch.guest_fpu);
> ++vcpu->stat.fpu_reload;
> - kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_DEACTIVATE_FPU, vcpu);
> + /*
> + * Currently KVM trigger FPU restore by #NM (via CR0.TS),
> + * till now only XCR0.bit0, XCR0.bit1, XCR0.bit2 is tracked
> + * by TS bit, there might be other FPU state is not tracked
> + * by TS bit. Here it only make FPU deactivate request and do
> + * FPU lazy restore for these cases: 1)xsave isn't enabled
> + * in guest, 2)all guest FPU states can be tracked by TS bit.
> + * For others, doing fully FPU eager restore.
> + */
> + if (!kvm_read_cr4_bits(vcpu, X86_CR4_OSXSAVE) ||
> + !(vcpu->arch.xcr0 & ~((u64)KVM_XSTATE_LAZY)))
> + kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_DEACTIVATE_FPU, vcpu);
> trace_kvm_fpu(0);
> }
>
> --
> 1.5.5
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-13 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-12 8:10 [PATCH v3] kvm/fpu: Enable fully eager restore kvm FPU Xudong Hao
2012-09-13 16:26 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2012-09-13 16:29 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-09-13 16:40 ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-17 2:07 ` Hao, Xudong
2012-09-17 13:30 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-09-18 1:08 ` Hao, Xudong
2012-09-19 10:23 ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-20 1:43 ` Hao, Xudong
2012-09-20 9:19 ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-21 8:47 ` Hao, Xudong
2012-09-23 9:03 ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-14 8:54 ` Hao, Xudong
2012-09-14 9:35 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-09-13 16:38 ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-14 8:52 ` Hao, Xudong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120913162636.GA10191@amt.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiantao.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.