From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from goalie.tycho.ncsc.mil (goalie [144.51.3.250]) by tarius.tycho.ncsc.mil (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q8DKk1KG028117 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 16:46:01 -0400 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8DKjxfK013196 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 16:45:59 -0400 Received: from localhost (vpn-9-132.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.9.132]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8DKjwdB003144 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 16:45:59 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 16:45:56 -0400 From: Eric Paris To: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Subject: system without libsepol Message-ID: <20120913164556.00d45eb3@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Is it reasonable to expect a system without libsepol to be able to load policy? I know the code can do it right now, but does anyone do it? I'd like to remove and try to rework some of that code so it is cleaner and more obvious. Anyone see a problem with requiring libspol be installed if libselinux was build with shared library expectations? -Eric -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.