From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail09.linbit.com (LINBIT Mail Daemon) with ESMTPS id 4A4661013803 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 21:26:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2so5379546pbb.27 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 12:26:02 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Tejun Heo Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 12:25:58 -0700 From: Tejun Heo To: Joseph Glanville Message-ID: <20120913192558.GK7677@google.com> References: <20120910230654.GF7677@google.com> <20120910233159.GE19739@google.com> <20120911155820.74f1f918@notabene.brown> <20120911082501.GH7028@soda.linbit> <20120912185824.GS7677@google.com> <20120912232019.GW7677@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: Jens Axboe , NeilBrown , Kent Overstreet , Philipp Reisner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Vivek Goyal , drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] FLUSH/FUA documentation & code discrepancy List-Id: Coordination of development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hello, Joseph. On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 01:10:13PM +1000, Joseph Glanville wrote: > While reviewing some of the documentation in Documentation/block I > found there is still out of date references to the old barrier code. > Should this also be removed? > I am not sufficiently confident of my understanding of the block layer > to do a through review/update of the Documentation/block stuff but my > untrained eye suggests maybe that such a undertaking is probably abit > overdue. Please be my guest. I'll be happy to review it. Thanks. -- tejun From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754189Ab2IMT0G (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Sep 2012 15:26:06 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:53481 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752410Ab2IMT0D (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Sep 2012 15:26:03 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 12:25:58 -0700 From: Tejun Heo To: Joseph Glanville Cc: NeilBrown , Kent Overstreet , Jens Axboe , Philipp Reisner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Vivek Goyal , drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] FLUSH/FUA documentation & code discrepancy Message-ID: <20120913192558.GK7677@google.com> References: <20120910230654.GF7677@google.com> <20120910233159.GE19739@google.com> <20120911155820.74f1f918@notabene.brown> <20120911082501.GH7028@soda.linbit> <20120912185824.GS7677@google.com> <20120912232019.GW7677@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, Joseph. On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 01:10:13PM +1000, Joseph Glanville wrote: > While reviewing some of the documentation in Documentation/block I > found there is still out of date references to the old barrier code. > Should this also be removed? > I am not sufficiently confident of my understanding of the block layer > to do a through review/update of the Documentation/block stuff but my > untrained eye suggests maybe that such a undertaking is probably abit > overdue. Please be my guest. I'll be happy to review it. Thanks. -- tejun