From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: SoC: convert MSM SMP to SoC descriptor Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 07:57:34 +0000 Message-ID: <201209140757.34393.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1347461906-13527-7-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <201209130847.20087.arnd@arndb.de> <20120913161548.GA11395@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:53015 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755187Ab2INH5h (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Sep 2012 03:57:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120913161548.GA11395@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: David Brown Cc: Marc Zyngier , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 13 September 2012, David Brown wrote: > Olof wanted me to try and split the msm-for-3.7 into a few branches, > so I'm going to work on that this morning. I'm not quite sure how > well it will work, since, for example, most of the cleanups are > preparing the tree for the devicetree changes. That is the common scenario. What you should do there is to have one cleanup branch that collects all the cleanups from the other branches, and then base each of the other branches on top of that. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 07:57:34 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: SoC: convert MSM SMP to SoC descriptor In-Reply-To: <20120913161548.GA11395@codeaurora.org> References: <1347461906-13527-7-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <201209130847.20087.arnd@arndb.de> <20120913161548.GA11395@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <201209140757.34393.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thursday 13 September 2012, David Brown wrote: > Olof wanted me to try and split the msm-for-3.7 into a few branches, > so I'm going to work on that this morning. I'm not quite sure how > well it will work, since, for example, most of the cleanups are > preparing the tree for the devicetree changes. That is the common scenario. What you should do there is to have one cleanup branch that collects all the cleanups from the other branches, and then base each of the other branches on top of that. Arnd