From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] uprobes: Fix UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP checks in handle_swbp()
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 19:15:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120914171557.GA29642@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120914171513.GA29599@redhat.com>
If handle_swbp()->add_utask() fails but UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP is set,
cleanup_ret: path do not restart the insn, this is wrong. Remove
this check and add the additional label for can_skip_sstep() = T
case.
Note also that UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP can be false positive, we simply
can not trust it unless arch_uprobe_skip_sstep() was already called.
Also, move another UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP check before can_skip_sstep()
into this helper, this looks more clean and understandable.
Note: probably we should rename "skip" to "emulate" and I think
that "clear UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP" should be moved to arch_can_skip.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 31 +++++++++++++++----------------
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 9893cba..403d2e0 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -1389,10 +1389,11 @@ bool uprobe_deny_signal(void)
*/
static bool can_skip_sstep(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- if (arch_uprobe_skip_sstep(&uprobe->arch, regs))
- return true;
-
- uprobe->flags &= ~UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP;
+ if (uprobe->flags & UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP) {
+ if (arch_uprobe_skip_sstep(&uprobe->arch, regs))
+ return true;
+ uprobe->flags &= ~UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP;
+ }
return false;
}
@@ -1494,12 +1495,12 @@ static void handle_swbp(struct pt_regs *regs)
utask = add_utask();
/* Cannot allocate; re-execute the instruction. */
if (!utask)
- goto cleanup_ret;
+ goto restart;
}
handler_chain(uprobe, regs);
- if (uprobe->flags & UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP && can_skip_sstep(uprobe, regs))
- goto cleanup_ret;
+ if (can_skip_sstep(uprobe, regs))
+ goto out;
if (!pre_ssout(uprobe, regs, bp_vaddr)) {
arch_uprobe_enable_step(&uprobe->arch);
@@ -1508,15 +1509,13 @@ static void handle_swbp(struct pt_regs *regs)
return;
}
-cleanup_ret:
- if (!(uprobe->flags & UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP))
-
- /*
- * cannot singlestep; cannot skip instruction;
- * re-execute the instruction.
- */
- instruction_pointer_set(regs, bp_vaddr);
-
+restart:
+ /*
+ * cannot singlestep; cannot skip instruction;
+ * re-execute the instruction.
+ */
+ instruction_pointer_set(regs, bp_vaddr);
+out:
put_uprobe(uprobe);
}
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-14 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-14 17:15 [PATCH 0/5] uprobes: handle_swbp() fixes Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-14 17:15 ` [PATCH 1/5] uprobes: Do not leak UTASK_BP_HIT if find_active_uprobe() fails Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-14 17:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-20 13:53 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-14 17:15 ` [PATCH 2/5] uprobes: Do not setup ->active_uprobe/state prematurely Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-20 13:55 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-14 17:15 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-09-15 7:39 ` [PATCH 3/5] uprobes: Fix UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP checks in handle_swbp() Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2012-09-15 15:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-17 17:20 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-18 16:07 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-20 14:43 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-24 20:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-29 17:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-20 14:05 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-14 17:16 ` [PATCH 4/5] uprobes: Kill UTASK_BP_HIT state Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-16 14:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-20 14:06 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-14 17:16 ` [PATCH 5/5] uprobes: Move clear_thread_flag(TIF_UPROBE) to uprobe_notify_resume() Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-20 14:06 ` Srikar Dronamraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120914171557.GA29642@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@redhat.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.