From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:12:01 +0200
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120917121159.GA3308@localhost.localdomain>
References: <5056C385.6090403@xenomai.org> <5056D4AE.2010201@web.de>
	<5056DA52.6040006@xenomai.org> <5056DCC5.10909@web.de>
	<5056E024.5020904@xenomai.org> <5056E863.4090606@siemens.com>
	<5056ED68.6050101@xenomai.org> <5056F09C.8050602@siemens.com>
	<5056F4A1.6070500@xenomai.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5056F4A1.6070500@xenomai.org>
Subject: Re: [Xenomai] IO-APIC latencies
List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/options/xenomai>,
	<mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai>,
	<mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, Xenomai <Xenomai@xenomai.org>

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:00:01PM +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> 
> The point is: people may want to use Xenomai on atoms. We do not really
> know on what kind of x86 people run xenomai, knowing that would help us
> directing our efforts.

FWIW, I was once involved in a project where we looked at atom and
considered running xenomai on it. I would think that improving worst
case latency on atom by 10 or 20 usec would be well worth the effort.

Thanks,
Richard