From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Youquan Song Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] x86,idle: Quickly notice prediction failure for repeat mode Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 22:15:15 -0400 Message-ID: <20120918021514.GA6997@linux-youquan.bj.intel.com> References: <1347933209-25939-1-git-send-email-youquan.song@intel.com> <1347933209-25939-2-git-send-email-youquan.song@intel.com> <50572CD1.700@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:52411 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756205Ab2IQOMb (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2012 10:12:31 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50572CD1.700@redhat.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Rik van Riel Cc: Youquan Song , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, arjan@linux.intel.com, lenb@kernel.org, Youquan Song > Could I convince you to try out my variation on > detect_repeating_intervals? :) > > http://people.redhat.com/riel/cstate/cstate-stddev-converge.patch > > I suspect that small change might help your code adapt to changed > conditions even faster. Yes. of course. your patch of cstate-stddev-converge is a good point by filter some noise first, then calculate further. I will try to integrate the patch to my patchset, then ask you review tomorrow. Thanks -Youquan