From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-pciback: support wild cards in slot specifications
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:25:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120918162550.GA1558@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5058771F020000780009C025@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:29:03PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Particularly for hiding sets of SR-IOV devices, specifying them all
> individually is rather cumbersome. Therefore, allow function and slot
> numbers to be replaced by a wildcard character ('*').
>
> Unfortunately this gets complicated by the in-kernel sscanf()
> implementation not being really standard conformant - matching of
> plain text tails cannot be checked by the caller (a patch to overcome
> this will be sent shortly, and a follow-up patch for simplifying the
> code is planned to be sent when that fixed went upstream).
applied for 3.7
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
>
> ---
> drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> --- 3.6-rc6/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> +++ 3.6-rc6-xen-pciback-wildcard/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> @@ -897,17 +897,41 @@ static inline int str_to_slot(const char
> int *slot, int *func)
> {
> int err;
> + char wc = '*';
>
> err = sscanf(buf, " %x:%x:%x.%x", domain, bus, slot, func);
> - if (err == 4)
> + switch (err) {
> + case 3:
> + *func = -1;
> + err = sscanf(buf, " %x:%x:%x.%c", domain, bus, slot, &wc);
> + break;
> + case 2:
> + *slot = *func = -1;
> + err = sscanf(buf, " %x:%x:*.%c", domain, bus, &wc);
> + if (err >= 2)
> + ++err;
> + break;
> + }
> + if (err == 4 && wc == '*')
> return 0;
> else if (err < 0)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> /* try again without domain */
> *domain = 0;
> + wc = '*';
> err = sscanf(buf, " %x:%x.%x", bus, slot, func);
> - if (err == 3)
> + switch (err) {
> + case 2:
> + *func = -1;
> + err = sscanf(buf, " %x:%x.%c", bus, slot, &wc);
> + break;
> + case 1:
> + *slot = *func = -1;
> + err = sscanf(buf, " %x:*.%c", bus, &wc) + 1;
> + break;
> + }
> + if (err == 3 && wc == '*')
> return 0;
>
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -930,6 +954,19 @@ static int pcistub_device_id_add(int dom
> {
> struct pcistub_device_id *pci_dev_id;
> unsigned long flags;
> + int rc = 0;
> +
> + if (slot < 0) {
> + for (slot = 0; !rc && slot < 32; ++slot)
> + rc = pcistub_device_id_add(domain, bus, slot, func);
> + return rc;
> + }
> +
> + if (func < 0) {
> + for (func = 0; !rc && func < 8; ++func)
> + rc = pcistub_device_id_add(domain, bus, slot, func);
> + return rc;
> + }
>
> pci_dev_id = kmalloc(sizeof(*pci_dev_id), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!pci_dev_id)
> @@ -952,15 +989,15 @@ static int pcistub_device_id_add(int dom
> static int pcistub_device_id_remove(int domain, int bus, int slot, int func)
> {
> struct pcistub_device_id *pci_dev_id, *t;
> - int devfn = PCI_DEVFN(slot, func);
> int err = -ENOENT;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&device_ids_lock, flags);
> list_for_each_entry_safe(pci_dev_id, t, &pcistub_device_ids,
> slot_list) {
> - if (pci_dev_id->domain == domain
> - && pci_dev_id->bus == bus && pci_dev_id->devfn == devfn) {
> + if (pci_dev_id->domain == domain && pci_dev_id->bus == bus
> + && (slot < 0 || PCI_SLOT(pci_dev_id->devfn) == slot)
> + && (func < 0 || PCI_FUNC(pci_dev_id->devfn) == func)) {
> /* Don't break; here because it's possible the same
> * slot could be in the list more than once
> */
> @@ -1216,6 +1253,10 @@ static ssize_t permissive_add(struct dev
> err = str_to_slot(buf, &domain, &bus, &slot, &func);
> if (err)
> goto out;
> + if (slot < 0 || func < 0) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> psdev = pcistub_device_find(domain, bus, slot, func);
> if (!psdev) {
> err = -ENODEV;
> @@ -1297,17 +1338,51 @@ static int __init pcistub_init(void)
>
> if (pci_devs_to_hide && *pci_devs_to_hide) {
> do {
> + char wc = '*';
> +
> parsed = 0;
>
> err = sscanf(pci_devs_to_hide + pos,
> " (%x:%x:%x.%x) %n",
> &domain, &bus, &slot, &func, &parsed);
> - if (err != 4) {
> + switch (err) {
> + case 3:
> + func = -1;
> + err = sscanf(pci_devs_to_hide + pos,
> + " (%x:%x:%x.%c) %n",
> + &domain, &bus, &slot, &wc,
> + &parsed);
> + break;
> + case 2:
> + slot = func = -1;
> + err = sscanf(pci_devs_to_hide + pos,
> + " (%x:%x:*.%c) %n",
> + &domain, &bus, &wc, &parsed) + 1;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (err != 4 || wc != '*') {
> domain = 0;
> + wc = '*';
> err = sscanf(pci_devs_to_hide + pos,
> " (%x:%x.%x) %n",
> &bus, &slot, &func, &parsed);
> - if (err != 3)
> + switch (err) {
> + case 2:
> + func = -1;
> + err = sscanf(pci_devs_to_hide + pos,
> + " (%x:%x.%c) %n",
> + &bus, &slot, &wc,
> + &parsed);
> + break;
> + case 1:
> + slot = func = -1;
> + err = sscanf(pci_devs_to_hide + pos,
> + " (%x:*.%c) %n",
> + &bus, &wc, &parsed) + 1;
> + break;
> + }
> + if (err != 3 || wc != '*')
> goto parse_error;
> }
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-18 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-18 11:29 [PATCH] xen-pciback: support wild cards in slot specifications Jan Beulich
2012-09-18 16:25 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-09-18 16:25 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-09-18 11:29 Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120918162550.GA1558@phenom.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.