From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the usb tree Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:18:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20120919071800.GE16905@kroah.com> References: <20120919143505.76e9d77d320ed278f7ce4798@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:34136 "EHLO out3-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753676Ab2ISHSD (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Sep 2012 03:18:03 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120919143505.76e9d77d320ed278f7ce4798@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Devendra Naga On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:35:05PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in > drivers/staging/serqt_usb2/serqt_usb2.c between commit e8656b02ef35 > ("USB: serial: serqt_usb2: remove dbg() usage") from the usb tree and > commit 623c2bb2c59a ("staging: serqt_usb2: fix dbg print when kzalloc > failed to allocate qt_port") from the staging tree. > > The former removes the line changed by the latter, so I just did that (no > action is required). That looks correct, thanks for doing this. greg k-h