From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752871Ab2ITKdV (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2012 06:33:21 -0400 Received: from mail.x86-64.org ([217.9.48.20]:42304 "EHLO mail.x86-64.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751627Ab2ITKdU (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2012 06:33:20 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:33:15 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Masami Hiramatsu , Borislav Petkov , Ingo Molnar , LKML , X86-ML , Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, kprobes: Hide skip_singlestep forward declaration properly Message-ID: <20120920103315.GC15391@aftab.osrc.amd.com> References: <1348062414-6578-1-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org> <505ADB6B.3070706@hitachi.com> <20120920092540.GB3611@gmail.com> <505AE3B5.6080401@hitachi.com> <20120920094017.GA4918@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120920094017.GA4918@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:40:17AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Could be moved into a separate file as well - we could have > arch/x86/kprobes/, with core.c, opt.c, ftrace.c and common.h in it - > possibly more in the future. So, I'm guessing I should move only the function now and let Masami do the proper splitup later, correct? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach GM: Alberto Bozzo Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551