From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/34] i.MX multi-platform support Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 07:41:50 -0400 Message-ID: <20120920114148.GH17666@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1348123547-31082-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <201209200739.34899.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C002652E5 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:42:03 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201209200739.34899.arnd@arndb.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Artem Bityutskiy , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Wim Van Sebroeck , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Florian Tobias Schandinat , Paulius Zaleckas , Chris Ball , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Sascha Hauer , Rob Herring , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Vinod Koul , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang , Javier Martin , Andrew Morton , Shawn Guo , Guennadi Liakhovetski List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 07:39:34AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The first five branches are scheduled to go through the arm-soc tree, so > I'm fine with that. For the sound/for-3.7 branch, I'd like to know when > to expect that hitting mainline. If it always gets in very early during the > merge window, it's probably ok to put the imx/multi-platform patches into > the same branch as the other ones in arm-soc and wait for the sound stuff > to hit mainline first, otherwise I'd suggest we start a second > next/multiplatform-2 branch for imx and send the first part early on > but then wait with the second batch before sound gets in. It's usually pretty early but Takashi will be on holiday this time so I'm not sure if things might be different (he was going to send the pull request from holiday). I also didn't guarantee that it'll be stable yet, can someone please tell me what the depenency is here? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:41:50 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/34] i.MX multi-platform support Message-Id: <20120920114148.GH17666@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> List-Id: References: <1348123547-31082-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <201209200739.34899.arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: <201209200739.34899.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Artem Bityutskiy , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Wim Van Sebroeck , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Florian Tobias Schandinat , Paulius Zaleckas , Chris Ball , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Sascha Hauer , Rob Herring , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Vinod Koul , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang , Javier Martin , Andrew Morton , Shawn Guo , Guennadi Liakhovetski On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 07:39:34AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The first five branches are scheduled to go through the arm-soc tree, so > I'm fine with that. For the sound/for-3.7 branch, I'd like to know when > to expect that hitting mainline. If it always gets in very early during the > merge window, it's probably ok to put the imx/multi-platform patches into > the same branch as the other ones in arm-soc and wait for the sound stuff > to hit mainline first, otherwise I'd suggest we start a second > next/multiplatform-2 branch for imx and send the first part early on > but then wait with the second batch before sound gets in. It's usually pretty early but Takashi will be on holiday this time so I'm not sure if things might be different (he was going to send the pull request from holiday). I also didn't guarantee that it'll be stable yet, can someone please tell me what the depenency is here? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 07:41:50 -0400 From: Mark Brown To: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/34] i.MX multi-platform support Message-ID: <20120920114148.GH17666@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1348123547-31082-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <201209200739.34899.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201209200739.34899.arnd@arndb.de> Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Artem Bityutskiy , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Wim Van Sebroeck , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Florian Tobias Schandinat , Paulius Zaleckas , Chris Ball , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Sascha Hauer , Rob Herring , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Vinod Koul , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang , Javier Martin , Andrew Morton , Shawn Guo , Guennadi Liakhovetski List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 07:39:34AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The first five branches are scheduled to go through the arm-soc tree, so > I'm fine with that. For the sound/for-3.7 branch, I'd like to know when > to expect that hitting mainline. If it always gets in very early during the > merge window, it's probably ok to put the imx/multi-platform patches into > the same branch as the other ones in arm-soc and wait for the sound stuff > to hit mainline first, otherwise I'd suggest we start a second > next/multiplatform-2 branch for imx and send the first part early on > but then wait with the second batch before sound gets in. It's usually pretty early but Takashi will be on holiday this time so I'm not sure if things might be different (he was going to send the pull request from holiday). I also didn't guarantee that it'll be stable yet, can someone please tell me what the depenency is here? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:34368 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754004Ab2ITLmF (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2012 07:42:05 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 07:41:50 -0400 From: Mark Brown To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Shawn Guo , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Sascha Hauer , Javier Martin , Rob Herring , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Florian Tobias Schandinat , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Chris Ball , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Guennadi Liakhovetski , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Artem Bityutskiy , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Wolfram Sang , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Wim Van Sebroeck , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Vinod Koul , Paulius Zaleckas Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/34] i.MX multi-platform support Message-ID: <20120920114148.GH17666@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1348123547-31082-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <201209200739.34899.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201209200739.34899.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 07:39:34AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The first five branches are scheduled to go through the arm-soc tree, so > I'm fine with that. For the sound/for-3.7 branch, I'd like to know when > to expect that hitting mainline. If it always gets in very early during the > merge window, it's probably ok to put the imx/multi-platform patches into > the same branch as the other ones in arm-soc and wait for the sound stuff > to hit mainline first, otherwise I'd suggest we start a second > next/multiplatform-2 branch for imx and send the first part early on > but then wait with the second batch before sound gets in. It's usually pretty early but Takashi will be on holiday this time so I'm not sure if things might be different (he was going to send the pull request from holiday). I also didn't guarantee that it'll be stable yet, can someone please tell me what the depenency is here? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 07:41:50 -0400 Subject: [PATCH v2 00/34] i.MX multi-platform support In-Reply-To: <201209200739.34899.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1348123547-31082-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <201209200739.34899.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <20120920114148.GH17666@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 07:39:34AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The first five branches are scheduled to go through the arm-soc tree, so > I'm fine with that. For the sound/for-3.7 branch, I'd like to know when > to expect that hitting mainline. If it always gets in very early during the > merge window, it's probably ok to put the imx/multi-platform patches into > the same branch as the other ones in arm-soc and wait for the sound stuff > to hit mainline first, otherwise I'd suggest we start a second > next/multiplatform-2 branch for imx and send the first part early on > but then wait with the second batch before sound gets in. It's usually pretty early but Takashi will be on holiday this time so I'm not sure if things might be different (he was going to send the pull request from holiday). I also didn't guarantee that it'll be stable yet, can someone please tell me what the depenency is here?