From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:49:56 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 01/11] ARM: defconfig: Remove CONFIG_MISC_DEVICES In-Reply-To: References: <1345307035-3545-1-git-send-email-festevam@gmail.com> Message-ID: <201209211449.56906.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Friday 21 September 2012, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Arnd, > > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > > I am not sure who would pick up this series. > > > > Is it possible for you to apply these patches? > > Is this something you can help with? > Hi Fabio, Sorry for not replying earlier. We could merge these through the arm-soc tree, but I'm not actually sure if they are necessary. For all I know, listing a nonexisting configuration option in a defconfig file has no effect, and the files get recreated whenever the maintainers choose to. Is there anything I am missing? Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757148Ab2IUQUO (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:20:14 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:61272 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754652Ab2IUQUM (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:20:12 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Fabio Estevam Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] ARM: defconfig: Remove CONFIG_MISC_DEVICES Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:49:56 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.5.0; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Fabio Estevam , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <1345307035-3545-1-git-send-email-festevam@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201209211449.56906.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:7NKVNPrlgiX4O84KmmG3IEKLy0Uyh3h9lw5qw2sLxpu gyZCwSqvrk9Ri+uyaJoPcCqvqF5IAAjeCcd25JKzbsQnyCYyd1 T/N6nGTbyV0m3ZoxeZO8TXasSiTbn4+1fL0Q3hsYIe6kLngS4j Fk+W18vK17vy+HUZfci545USrsY83VWCtZNQVH6Q6HKRS0Jps1 75vh/3VYj4exZCUaJ3cfZv6BcJm19Q8FRj5xmTcBviMEe+PN1b Dc3ttLZEhA3esABTlRd3zkU60V7esnz3sfV+gUDGMMa7YilBO0 Tr8wFOs5rI0LIiLEKx3IMs+YtQBvuGodVfcxCG5ZtiuH52Pngt XGJZ6yx1I6h9JfQUfok0= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 21 September 2012, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Arnd, > > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > > I am not sure who would pick up this series. > > > > Is it possible for you to apply these patches? > > Is this something you can help with? > Hi Fabio, Sorry for not replying earlier. We could merge these through the arm-soc tree, but I'm not actually sure if they are necessary. For all I know, listing a nonexisting configuration option in a defconfig file has no effect, and the files get recreated whenever the maintainers choose to. Is there anything I am missing? Arnd