From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Reply-To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 08:02:02 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com>
Message-ID: <20120925040202.GA17983@openwall.com>
References: <5060AB3F.5030400@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5060AB3F.5030400@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Linux security workgroup usage of kernel-hardening mailing list
To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
List-ID: <kernel-hardening.lists.openwall.com>

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:49:35PM -0400, Corey Bryant wrote:
> The charter of the workgroup is to provide on-going security 
> verification of Linux kernel subsystems in order to assist in securing 
> the Linux Kernel and maintain trust and confidence in the security of 
> the Linux ecosystem.
> 
> This may include, but is not limited to, topics such as tooling to 
> assist in securing the Linux Kernel, verification and testing of 
> critical subsystems for vulnerabilities, security improvements for build 
> tools, and providing guidance for maintaining subsystem security.
> 
> Would it be okay if we used the kernel-hardening mailing list for 
> communication?

Of course!  Please do.

> If our traffic ever gets to be too much

This would be a good problem to have (well, assuming that list traffic
correlates with actual progress).

Alexander