On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 09:34:45PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:22:37PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 08:07:01AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 07:19:38PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > > Hi Paul, > > > > > > > > I've just bisected down one RCU stall problem: > > > > > > > > [ 12.035785] pktgen: Packet Generator for packet performance testing. Version: 2.74 > > > > [ 12.435439] atkbd: probe of serio0 rejects match -19 > > > > [ 111.700160] INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: { 1} (detected by 0, t=10002 jiffies) > > > > [ 111.700171] Pid: 0, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.6.0-rc5-00004-gda10491 #1 > > > > [ 111.700178] Call Trace: > > > > [ 111.700475] [] rcu_check_callbacks+0x544/0x570 > > > > [ 111.700538] [] update_process_times+0x36/0x70 > > > > [ 111.700547] [] tick_sched_timer+0x57/0xc0 > > > > [ 111.700552] [] __run_hrtimer.isra.31+0x4a/0xc0 > > > > [ 111.700557] [] ? tick_nohz_handler+0xf0/0xf0 > > > > [ 111.700559] [] hrtimer_interrupt+0xf5/0x290 > > > > [ 111.700562] [] ? sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event+0x18/0x20 > > > > [ 111.700565] [] ? tick_nohz_stop_idle+0x39/0x40 > > > > [ 111.700572] [] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x4f/0x80 > > > > [ 111.700587] [] apic_timer_interrupt+0x2a/0x30 > > > > [ 111.700593] [] ? native_safe_halt+0x5/0x10 > > > > [ 111.700599] [] default_idle+0x29/0x50 > > > > [ 111.700601] [] cpu_idle+0x68/0xb0 > > > > [ 111.700609] [] rest_init+0x67/0x70 > > > > [ 111.700627] [] start_kernel+0x2ea/0x2f0 > > > > [ 111.700629] [] ? repair_env_string+0x51/0x51 > > > > [ 111.700631] [] i386_start_kernel+0x78/0x7d > > > > [ 127.040302] bus: 'serio': driver_probe_device: matched device serio0 with driver atkbd > > > > [ 127.041308] CPA self-test: > > > > > > > > to this commit: > > > > > > > > commit 06ae115a1d551cd952d80df06eaf8b5153351875 > > > > Author: Paul E. McKenney > > > > Date: Sun Aug 14 15:56:54 2011 -0700 > > > > > > > > rcu: Avoid having just-onlined CPU resched itself when RCU is idle > > > > > > Interesting. Of course the stack is from the CPU that detected the > > > problem rather than the problematic CPU. ;-) > > > > > > Could you please try the following patch? > > > > Paul, thanks for the quick fix! However it may still stall sometimes. > > Attached are 3 dmesgs with the stalls. > > Do you have c96ea7cf from -rcu applied? Corresponding patch is below. Nope. I did try linux-next first however the first patch cannot apply at all. And I don't know which of the many -rcu branches to work on ;-) > Thanx, Paul > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > rcu: Avoid spurious RCU CPU stall warnings No luck.. I applied the two patches on linus/master and still get the attached warning. Thanks, Fengguang