All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Wrap external callers to IPS state with appropriate locks
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:47:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120926114723.GA1980@bremse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348564572-20046-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:16:12AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Finishes commit 02d719562ef40483648b2cc46899d4a2ff5953bb
> Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Date:   Thu Aug 9 16:44:54 2012 +0200
> 
>     drm/i915: properly guard ilk ips state
> 
> The core functions were annotated with their locking requirements, but
> we overlooked that they were exported, without any control over the
> locking, to debugfs. So in order to enable debugfs to read the registers
> without triggering sanity checks, we change the exported entry points to
> properly take the required locks before calling the core routines.
> 
> Reported-by: yangguang <guang.a.yang@intel.com>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55304
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Merged, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c |   40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 4e16cc1..f459e30 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -2735,7 +2735,7 @@ static const struct cparams {
>  	{ 0, 800, 231, 23784 },
>  };
>  
> -unsigned long i915_chipset_val(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +static unsigned long __i915_chipset_val(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
>  	u64 total_count, diff, ret;
>  	u32 count1, count2, count3, m = 0, c = 0;
> @@ -2789,6 +2789,22 @@ unsigned long i915_chipset_val(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +unsigned long i915_chipset_val(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> +	unsigned long val;
> +
> +	if (dev_priv->info->gen != 5)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> +
> +	val = __i915_chipset_val(dev_priv);
> +
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> +
> +	return val;
> +}
> +
>  unsigned long i915_mch_val(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
>  	unsigned long m, x, b;
> @@ -2992,7 +3008,7 @@ void i915_update_gfx_val(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	spin_unlock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
>  }
>  
> -unsigned long i915_gfx_val(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +static unsigned long __i915_gfx_val(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
>  	unsigned long t, corr, state1, corr2, state2;
>  	u32 pxvid, ext_v;
> @@ -3029,6 +3045,22 @@ unsigned long i915_gfx_val(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	return dev_priv->ips.gfx_power + state2;
>  }
>  
> +unsigned long i915_gfx_val(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> +	unsigned long val;
> +
> +	if (dev_priv->info->gen != 5)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> +
> +	val = __i915_gfx_val(dev_priv);
> +
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> +
> +	return val;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * i915_read_mch_val - return value for IPS use
>   *
> @@ -3045,8 +3077,8 @@ unsigned long i915_read_mch_val(void)
>  		goto out_unlock;
>  	dev_priv = i915_mch_dev;
>  
> -	chipset_val = i915_chipset_val(dev_priv);
> -	graphics_val = i915_gfx_val(dev_priv);
> +	chipset_val = __i915_chipset_val(dev_priv);
> +	graphics_val = __i915_gfx_val(dev_priv);
>  
>  	ret = chipset_val + graphics_val;
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-26 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-25  9:16 [PATCH] drm/i915: Wrap external callers to IPS state with appropriate locks Chris Wilson
2012-09-26 11:47 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-09-25 13:25 Chris Wilson
2012-09-25 13:55 ` Chris Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120926114723.GA1980@bremse \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.