From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 16:13:53 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCHv5] ARM: Add Altera SOCFPGA Cyclone5
In-Reply-To: <20121003131145.GA4720@elf.ucw.cz>
References: <1349217924-3792-1-git-send-email-dinguyen@altera.com>
	<20121002223310.GH30129@bill-the-cat>
	<20121003135900.302c0944@lilith>
	<20121003125635.GA25959@elf.ucw.cz>
	<20121003131145.GA4720@elf.ucw.cz>
Message-ID: <20121003161353.03e34ca8@lilith>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Pavel,

On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 15:11:45 +0200, Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de> wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> > But this one is a mystery. Offending lines are:
> > 
> > #include <netdev.h>
> > 
> > DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
> > 
> > [line 26:] void show_boot_progress(int progress)
> > {
> >         debug("Boot reached stage %d\n", progress);
> > }
> > 
> > Do we need direct include asm/global_data.h for
> > DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR? Is something funny going on with debug()? Is
> > show_boot_progress() a macro in your build? Would it be enough to
> > check out current u-boot-arm to reproduce?
> 
> show_boot_progress() became a macro (for SPL build only, in the tree I
> can see). We can add an ifdef, but perhaps we should just delete the
> function...
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
> 
> Thanks,

Can you post a proper V6 patch with history updated?

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.