From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [patch v4 00/13] xfs: remove the xfssyncd mess
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 12:18:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121005171853.985930109@sgi.com> (raw)
Hi Dave,
Here I am reposting your xfssyncd series. I want to make sure that
we're all on the same page. In particular, are we all happy with patch
6, 'xfs: xfs_sync_data is redundant'?
Version 4:
- updated 'xfs: xfs_sync_data is redundant' with cleanups to the
xfs_flush_inodes interface as per Christoph's request,
- updated 'xfs: xfs_sync_data is redundant', folding in changes from
http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-10/msg00036.html
- fixed a minor typo in xfs: 'syncd workqueue is no more', renaming the
log worker from 'xfs-reclaim' to 'xfs-log'.
I was going to rush this in for the 3.7 merge window. However in the
light of the issues with patch 6 and Linus's comment here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/30/152 and Stephen's comment here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/23/144, I think it wiser to behave. 3.7
is stable without this series, so I will merge it for 3.8.
Once we have an agreement that patch 6 is ready I will pull this in to the
master branch first thing after the 3.7-rc1 merge from upstream.
Regards,
Ben
Version 3 of the patchset I described here:
http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-06/msg00064.html
This patchset reliably exposed the log->l_last_sync_lsn problem I
just posted a fix for.
Version 3:
- per-mount log and reclaim workqueues instead of a generic mount
workqueue.
- reordering of some of the patches as Christoph requested.
- fixed the writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle deadlock by moving it all
the way back up the write stack to xfs_file_aio_buffered_write
where we were just flushing the current file to avoid deadlocking
on it anyway.
- reintroduced xfs_flush_inodes() as a wrapper for
writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle().
- rebased on a current TOT.
Version 2:
- fix writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle call in xfs_create()
- refreshed patch 13 before sending.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next reply other threads:[~2012-10-05 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-05 17:18 Ben Myers [this message]
2012-10-05 17:18 ` [patch v4 01/13] [PATCH 01/13] xfs: xfs_syncd_stop must die Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:18 ` [patch v4 02/13] [PATCH 02/13] xfs: rationalise xfs_mount_wq users Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:18 ` [patch v4 03/13] [PATCH 03/13] xfs: dont run the sync work if the filesystem is Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:18 ` [patch v4 04/13] [PATCH 04/13] xfs: sync work is now only periodic log work Ben Myers
2012-10-05 18:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-05 18:31 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-10-05 17:18 ` [patch v4 05/13] [PATCH 05/13] xfs: Bring some sanity to log unmounting Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:18 ` [patch v4 06/13] [PATCH 06/13] xfs: xfs_sync_data is redundant Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:55 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-10-05 18:04 ` Ben Myers
2012-10-05 18:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-05 18:15 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-10-05 17:19 ` [patch v4 07/13] [PATCH 07/13] xfs: syncd workqueue is no more Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:59 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-10-05 17:19 ` [patch v4 08/13] [PATCH 08/13] xfs: xfs_sync_fsdata is redundant Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:19 ` [patch v4 09/13] [PATCH 09/13] xfs: move xfs_quiesce_attr() into xfs_super.c Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:19 ` [patch v4 10/13] [PATCH 10/13] xfs: xfs_quiesce_attr() should quiesce the log like Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:19 ` [patch v4 11/13] [PATCH 11/13] xfs: rename xfs_sync.[ch] to xfs_icache.[ch] Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:19 ` [patch v4 12/13] [PATCH 12/13] xfs: move inode locking functions to xfs_inode.c Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:19 ` [patch v4 13/13] [PATCH 13/13] xfs: remove xfs_iget.c Ben Myers
2012-10-06 1:31 ` [patch v4 00/13] xfs: remove the xfssyncd mess Dave Chinner
2012-10-06 17:37 ` Ben Myers
2012-10-08 0:33 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121005171853.985930109@sgi.com \
--to=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.