All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Goffredo Baroncelli" <kreijack@gmail.com>,
	"Chris Mason" <chris.mason@fusionio.com>,
	"Hugo Mills" <hugo@carfax.org.uk>,
	"Roman Mamedov" <rm@romanrm.ru>,
	"Sébastien Maury" <sebastien.maury@inserm.fr>,
	"Ilya Dryomov" <idryomov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][BTRFS-PROGS][V3] btrfs filesystem df
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 11:57:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201210061157.03992.Martin@lichtvoll.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1349371679-10775-1-git-send-email-kreijack@inwind.com>

Am Donnerstag, 4. Oktober 2012 schrieb Goffredo Baroncelli:
> Hi Chris,
> 
> this serie of patches updated the command "btrfs filesystem
> df". I update this command because it is not so easy to get
> the information about the disk usage from the command "fi df" and "fi show".
> This patch was the result of some discussions on the btrfs 
> mailing list. Many thanks to all the contributors.
> 
> From the man page (see 2nd patch):
> 
> [...]
> The  command  btrfs  filesystem  df is used to query the
> status of the chunks, how many space on the disk(s) are used  by
> the  chunks,  how many space are available in the chunks, and an
> estimation of the free space of the filesystem.
> [...]
> 
> $ ./btrfs filesystem df --help
> usage: btrfs filesystem disk-usage [-k] <path> [<path>..]
> 
>     Show space usage information for a mount point(s).
> 
>     -k  Set KB (1024 bytes) as unit
> 
> $ ./btrfs filesystem df /
> Path: /
> Summary:
>   Disk_size:                 72.57GB
>   Disk_allocated:            25.10GB
>   Disk_unallocated:          47.48GB
>   Logical_size:              23.06GB
>   Used:                      11.01GB
>   Free_(Estimated):          55.66GB    (Max: 59.52GB, Min: 35.78GB)
>   Data_to_disk_ratio:           92 %
> 
> Details:
>   Chunk_type  Mode     Size_(disk) Size_(logical)     Used
>   Data        Single       21.01GB      21.01GB     10.34GB
>   System      DUP          80.00MB      40.00MB      4.00KB
>   System      Single        4.00MB       4.00MB        0.00
>   Metadata    DUP           4.00GB       2.00GB    686.93MB
>   Metadata    Single        8.00MB       8.00MB        0.00

Works nicely here:

merkaba:/home/[…]> ./btrfs fi df /
Path: /
Summary:
  Disk_size:                 18.62GB
  Disk_allocated:            18.62GB
  Disk_unallocated:             0.00
  Logical_size:              16.87GB
  Used:                      12.46GB
  Free_(Estimated):           4.41GB    (Max: 4.41GB, Min: 4.41GB)
  Data_to_disk_ratio:           91 %

Details:
  Chunk_type  Mode     Size_(disk) Size_(logical)     Used
  Data        Single       15.10GB     15.10GB     11.78GB
  System      DUP          16.00MB      8.00MB      4.00KB
  System      Single        4.00MB      4.00MB        0.00
  Metadata    DUP           3.50GB      1.75GB    693.97MB
  Metadata    Single        8.00MB      8.00MB        0.00


merkaba:/home/[…]> ./btrfs fi df /mnt/amazon
Path: /mnt/amazon
Summary:
  Disk_size:                465.76GB
  Disk_allocated:           465.76GB
  Disk_unallocated:           4.00KB
  Logical_size:             455.75GB
  Used:                     368.83GB
  Free_(Estimated):          86.93GB    (Max: 86.93GB, Min: 86.93GB)
  Data_to_disk_ratio:           98 %

Details:
  Chunk_type  Mode     Size_(disk) Size_(logical)     Used
  Data        Single      445.73GB    445.73GB    368.24GB
  System      DUP          16.00MB      8.00MB     64.00KB
  System      Single        4.00MB      4.00MB        0.00
  Metadata    DUP          20.00GB     10.00GB    598.84MB
  Metadata    Single        8.00MB      8.00MB        0.00


I wonder about free size estimation minimum and maximum are the same tough.

Do you have a explaination for this?

Otherwise:

Tested-By: Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>

(as of commit c3f7fa95f3aa29972b79eed71ec063b6a3019017 from your repo.)


The data to disk ratio on bigger disk is lower due to less duplicated meta
data involved, I bet. I want to recreate / anyway with 16 KiB leaf and node
size and then I think I will use single for metadata as its an SSD. The
bigger one is external eSATA harddisk.


I can test and post outputs of a few other disks including my oldest BTRFS
filesystems on a ThinkPad T23 which are at least one, possible almost 2
years old. Is there are way to tell filesystem creation date? And a 2 TiB
backup disk with three or for subvolumes and >10 snapshots of all of them
together.

> Where:
>         Disk_size                       -> sum of sizes of teh disks
>         Disk_allocated                  -> sum of chunk sizes
>         Disk_unallocated                -> Disk_size - Disk_allocated
>         Logical_size                    -> sum of logical area sizes
>         Used                            -> logical area used
>         Free_(Estimated)                -> on the basis of allocated
>                                            chunk, an estrapolation of
>                                            the free space
>         Data_to_disk_ratio              -> ration between the space occuped
>                                            by a chunk and the real space
>                                            available ( due to duplication
>                                            and/or RAID level)
>         Chunk_type                      -> kind of chunk
>         Mode                            -> allocation policy of a chunk
>         Size_(disk)                     -> area of disk(s) occuped by the
>                                            chunk (see it as raw space used)
>         Size_(logical)                  -> logical area size of the chunk
>         Used                            -> portion of the logical area
>                                            used by the filesystem
[…]
-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-10-06  9:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-04 17:27 [PATCH][BTRFS-PROGS][V3] btrfs filesystem df Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-04 17:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] Update btrfs filesystem df command Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-04 17:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] Update help page Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-06  9:57 ` Martin Steigerwald [this message]
2012-10-06 13:47   ` [PATCH][BTRFS-PROGS][V3] btrfs filesystem df Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-09 13:51 ` David Sterba
2012-10-09 18:07   ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-09 22:15     ` David Sterba
2012-10-10 17:26       ` Goffredo Baroncelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201210061157.03992.Martin@lichtvoll.de \
    --to=martin@lichtvoll.de \
    --cc=chris.mason@fusionio.com \
    --cc=hugo@carfax.org.uk \
    --cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
    --cc=kreijack@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rm@romanrm.ru \
    --cc=sebastien.maury@inserm.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.