From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] uprobes: Fix handle_swbp() vs unregister() + register() race
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 23:07:19 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121006173719.GA9143@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121006172531.GB9819@redhat.com>
>
> for the future changes... (say, we can remove bp if consumers do not
> want to trace this task). Not sure it makes sense to change it right
> now.
>
> So. Should I leave this patch as is? Or do you want me to move this
> check into handler_chain() and make it return "bool restart"?
Lets keep it as is for now.
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-06 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-30 19:41 [PATCH 0/7] uprobes: register/unregister bugfixes Oleg Nesterov
2012-09-30 19:41 ` [PATCH 1/7] uprobes/x86: Only rep+nop can be emulated correctly Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06 7:20 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-30 19:42 ` [PATCH 2/7] uprobes: Don't return success if alloc_uprobe() fails Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06 7:25 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-30 19:42 ` [PATCH 3/7] uprobes: Do not delete uprobe if uprobe_unregister() fails Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06 8:48 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-30 19:42 ` [PATCH 4/7] uprobes: Fix handle_swbp() vs unregister() + register() race Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-02 18:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06 9:33 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-10-06 17:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06 17:37 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2012-10-06 18:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-07 7:12 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-30 19:42 ` [PATCH 5/7] uprobes: Introduce uprobe_copy_insn() Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06 9:45 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-10-06 17:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06 17:38 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-10-06 18:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-07 7:14 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-30 19:42 ` [PATCH 6/7] uprobes: Fix uprobe_copy_insn() race with itself Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-06 9:52 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-30 19:42 ` [PATCH 7/7] uprobes: Fix the racy uprobe->flags manipulation Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-04 8:57 ` Anton Arapov
2012-10-06 9:54 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-30 19:44 ` [PATCH 0/7] uprobes: register/unregister bugfixes Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-01 12:55 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-10-01 14:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121006173719.GA9143@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@redhat.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.