All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: m.olbrich@pengutronix.de (Michael Olbrich)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Problem with 64-bit registers on i.MX53
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 18:08:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121008160841.GM19651@pengutronix.de> (raw)


Hi,

I have a problem that looks like that 64-bit registers (I think) are not
saved/restored correctly on a context switch. I've reduced it to the
following test case:

- Latest Linux mainline kernel (v3.6-8559-ge9eca4d)
  v3.5 is also affected
- imx_v6_v7_defconfig
- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53-evk.dts

The following test program is compiled with "-mcpu=cortex-a8 -mfpu=neon
-O2".
------------------------>8--------------------------------
#include <inttypes.h>
#include <assert.h>

volatile int x = 2;
volatile int64_t y = 2;

int main() {
	volatile int a = 0;
	volatile int64_t b = 0;
	while (1) {
		a = (a + x) % (1 << 30);
		b = (b + y) % (1 << 30);
		assert(a == b);
	}
}
------------------------>8--------------------------------
The ".. (b + y) .." should result in "vadd.i64 d19, d18, d16" or
something like that.

If I start the program twice in parallel, then on aborts immediately with
the assert().
When looking at it with the debugger, it seems as if the calculation
"b = (b + y) % (1 << 30)" produces an incorrect value.

A single instance of the program runs longer, but hits the assert()
eventually. So running multiple processes that use 64-bit registers
triggers the problem really fast. This is why I think the problem has
something to do with context switches.
Not using 64-bit registers (-msoft-float) makes the problem go away.
So it's definitely related to 64-bit registers.

If I disable all MX31/MX35 boards (and therefore all ARMv6 support), then
it works as expected.

Any ideas what goes wrong here?

Regards,
Michael Olbrich

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

             reply	other threads:[~2012-10-08 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-08 16:08 Michael Olbrich [this message]
2012-10-08 17:01 ` Problem with 64-bit registers on i.MX53 Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-08 17:10   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-08 17:50     ` Dave Martin
2012-10-08 18:03       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-08 18:04         ` Dave Martin
2012-10-09  9:02       ` Michael Olbrich
2012-10-09  8:52     ` Michael Olbrich
2012-10-09  9:02     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2012-10-09 14:05       ` Dave Martin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121008160841.GM19651@pengutronix.de \
    --to=m.olbrich@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.