From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vms173009pub.verizon.net (vms173009pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.9]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2764E0027E; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 11:48:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [72.66.25.115]) by vms173009.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0MBL009Q787Q3DA0@vms173009.mailsrvcs.net>; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 13:47:51 -0500 (CDT) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C94B0200DD; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 14:47:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 14:47:50 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Paul Eggleton Message-id: <20121008184750.GA6492@denix.org> References: <7034165.eLERhWRCDa@helios> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <7034165.eLERhWRCDa@helios> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org, gumstix-users@lists.sourceforge.net, angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org, yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [meta-ti] meta-gumstix proceedings X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 18:48:10 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-disposition: inline Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 12:18:24PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > On Monday 08 October 2012 12:54:46 Andreas Müller wrote: > > as some of you might know, gumstix created an official BSP layer > > [1][2]. To avoid confusion I renamed my layer from meta-gumstix to > > meta-gumstix-community [3]. Users should either switch to the official > > meta-gumstix layer or rename meta-gumstix to meta-gumstix-community > > [3] in git configuration (users of angstrom-setup-scripts should also > > change the name in layers.txt). > > So what should we do with the layer index [4]? Do we list both? What is the > delta between them, and is there a hope that there will be only one layer at > some point? Paul, FYI, http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.distributions.gumstix.general/65109/focus=65131 -- Denys From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vms173009pub.verizon.net (vms173009pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.9]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2764E0027E; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 11:48:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [72.66.25.115]) by vms173009.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0MBL009Q787Q3DA0@vms173009.mailsrvcs.net>; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 13:47:51 -0500 (CDT) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C94B0200DD; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 14:47:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 14:47:50 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Paul Eggleton Message-id: <20121008184750.GA6492@denix.org> References: <7034165.eLERhWRCDa@helios> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <7034165.eLERhWRCDa@helios> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org, gumstix-users@lists.sourceforge.net, angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org, yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [yocto] meta-gumstix proceedings X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 18:48:10 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-disposition: inline Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 12:18:24PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > On Monday 08 October 2012 12:54:46 Andreas Müller wrote: > > as some of you might know, gumstix created an official BSP layer > > [1][2]. To avoid confusion I renamed my layer from meta-gumstix to > > meta-gumstix-community [3]. Users should either switch to the official > > meta-gumstix layer or rename meta-gumstix to meta-gumstix-community > > [3] in git configuration (users of angstrom-setup-scripts should also > > change the name in layers.txt). > > So what should we do with the layer index [4]? Do we list both? What is the > delta between them, and is there a hope that there will be only one layer at > some point? Paul, FYI, http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.distributions.gumstix.general/65109/focus=65131 -- Denys