All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: Ronny Meeus <ronny.meeus@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: 2GB userspace limitation in ABI N32
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 12:18:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121012101817.GC30020@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMJ=MEeSxpcLRCWmkOn7w4Ge1J9Bg7_bFN+Z8xPoYumGFddabA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 05:12:16PM +0200, Ronny Meeus wrote:

> Do you have any clue (rough) on the amount of effort this change would cost?

David Daney's reply should give you more information for an estimate.

> About the limited gain we can discuss: if you have a large application
> that has been created assuming 32bit and it needs to be ported to a
> 64bit architecture, I think the effort can be huge and the risk for
> forgetting things is high. It will be very hard to check whether the
> system behaves well under all conditions.

A 64-bit port could start right away without the delay of waiting for
a usable N32-4GB.  Added benefit - with N64 you can grow beyond the 3GB.

Downside, due to larger pointers thus better cache locality 32-bit code
generally performs better.  And I agree that verification of N32-4GB
probably is easier than for a large application that wasn't written
with the intend of 64-bit support.

In my past as a contractor I've dealth with a few customers who were
trying to avoid going 64-bit at all cost.  They had to pay that cost ...

  Ralf

      reply	other threads:[~2012-10-12 10:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-10  6:32 2GB userspace limitation in ABI N32 Ronny Meeus
2012-10-10  8:07 ` Ralf Baechle
2012-10-10 12:57   ` Rich Felker
2012-10-10 16:56     ` David Daney
2012-10-10 17:10       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-10-10 17:34         ` David Daney
2012-10-10 17:49           ` Ronny Meeus
2012-10-10 18:08             ` David Daney
2012-10-10 15:12   ` Ronny Meeus
2012-10-12 10:18     ` Ralf Baechle [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121012101817.GC30020@linux-mips.org \
    --to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=ronny.meeus@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.