From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: pablo@netfilter.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] netfilter: ipset: timeout fixing bug broke SET target special timeout value
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 16:40:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121015234022.GB667@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121015232750.GA32665@kroah.com>
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 04:27:50PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 04:22:25PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:17:38PM +0200, pablo@netfilter.org wrote:
> > > From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
> > >
> > > The patch "127f559 netfilter: ipset: fix timeout value overflow bug"
> > > broke the SET target when no timeout was specified.
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Jean-Philippe Menil <jean-philippe.menil@univ-nantes.fr>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
> > > Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > This patch requires:
> > >
> > > commit 127f559127f5175e4bec3dab725a34845d956591
> > > Author: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
> > > Date: Mon May 7 02:35:44 2012 +0000
> > >
> > > netfilter: ipset: fix timeout value overflow bug
> > >
> > > Large timeout parameters could result wrong timeout values due to
> > > an overflow at msec to jiffies conversion (reported by Andreas Herz)
> >
> > This patch doesn't apply to the 3.0.y series, care to provide a
> > backport, and a backported version of the original patch above that
> > needs it?
>
> Oh wait, should I apply the 3.0.y specific patches first? I'll go do
> that and see if these two then apply here...
Nope, doesn't apply. Care to backport both of these patches for 3.0.y
and send them to us?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-15 23:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-11 10:17 [PATCH] Netfilter/IPVS updates for stable 3.4 onwards pablo
2012-10-11 10:17 ` [PATCH 1/3] ipvs: fix oops in ip_vs_dst_event on rmmod pablo
2012-10-11 10:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix racy timer handling with reliable events pablo
2012-10-11 10:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] netfilter: ipset: timeout fixing bug broke SET target special timeout value pablo
2012-10-15 23:22 ` Greg KH
2012-10-15 23:27 ` Greg KH
2012-10-15 23:40 ` Greg KH [this message]
2012-10-16 9:36 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-10-16 16:32 ` Greg KH
2012-10-17 2:09 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-10-11 22:20 ` [PATCH] Netfilter/IPVS updates for stable 3.4 onwards David Miller
2012-10-15 23:22 ` Greg KH
2012-10-15 23:18 ` Greg KH
2012-10-16 9:04 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-10-16 14:38 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-10-16 16:31 ` Greg KH
2012-10-16 21:04 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-10-11 10:07 pablo
2012-10-11 10:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] netfilter: ipset: timeout fixing bug broke SET target special timeout value pablo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121015234022.GB667@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.