All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>,
	Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Chanho Min <chanho.min@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] block: Avoid that request_fn is invoked on a dead queue
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 16:38:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121016233829.GK16166@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50758F51.3020601@acm.org>

Hello,

On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 05:08:01PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> A block driver may start cleaning up resources needed by its
> request_fn as soon as blk_cleanup_queue() finished, so request_fn
> must not be invoked after draining finished.

Can you please make the commit message more verbose preferably with
example crash trace?  It's difficult to tell what bug it's trying to
fix how.

>  /**
> + * __blk_run_queue_uncond - run a queue whether or not it has been stopped
> + * @q:	The queue to run
> + *
> + * Description:
> + *    Invoke request handling on a queue if there are any pending requests.
> + *    May be used to restart request handling after a request has completed.
> + *    This variant runs the queue whether or not the queue has been
> + *    stopped. Must be called with the queue lock held and interrupts
> + *    disabled. See also @blk_run_queue.
> + */
> +void __blk_run_queue_uncond(struct request_queue *q)
> +{
> +	if (unlikely(blk_queue_dead(q)))
> +		return;
> +
> +	q->request_fn(q);
> +}
> +
> +/**
>   * __blk_run_queue - run a single device queue
>   * @q:	The queue to run
>   *
> @@ -305,7 +324,7 @@ void __blk_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
>  	if (unlikely(blk_queue_stopped(q)))
>  		return;
>  
> -	q->request_fn(q);
> +	__blk_run_queue_uncond(q);

__blk_run_queue_uncond() is a cold path and I don't think adding a
test there matters but I think it would be better if we avoid an extra
branch if possible for __blk_run_queue().  Can't we merge
blk_queue_stopped/dead() testing?

> @@ -401,6 +420,9 @@ void blk_drain_queue(struct request_queue *q, bool drain_all)
>  			}
>  		}
>  
> +		if (!drain && blk_queue_dying(q))
> +			queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_DEAD, q);
> +

Wouldn't doing this in blk_cleanup_queue() be better?  It may involve
an extra queue locking but I don't think that matter at all in that
path and doing things where they belong is far more important.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-16 23:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-10 15:05 [PATCH 0/4 v4] More device removal fixes Bart Van Assche
2012-10-10 15:07 ` [PATCH 1/4] block: Rename queue dead flag Bart Van Assche
2012-10-16 23:31   ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-10 15:08 ` [PATCH 2/4] block: Avoid that request_fn is invoked on a dead queue Bart Van Assche
2012-10-16 23:38   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-10-23 12:11     ` Bart Van Assche
2012-10-24 19:13       ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-10 15:09 ` [PATCH 3/4] Make blk_cleanup_queue() wait until request_fn finished Bart Van Assche
2012-10-16 23:51   ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-23 12:16     ` Bart Van Assche
2012-10-24 19:11       ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-10 15:10 ` [PATCH 4/4] Fix race between starved list processing and device removal Bart Van Assche
2012-10-16 23:59   ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121016233829.GK16166@google.com \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=chanho.min@lge.com \
    --cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.