All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.hashim@st.com>
To: viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>,
	<spear--sw-devel@lists.codex.cro.st.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <spear-devel@list.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: add spear pwm driver support
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 15:13:09 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121019094308.GC4185@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOh2x=kXu2EG4GFaW8HpSi=VFLvGEMEyeN_3L74wU2sfe1Z=uQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Viresh,

On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:23:08PM +0530, viresh kumar wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.hashim@st.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:11:06PM +0530, viresh kumar wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.hashim@st.com> wrote:
> 
> >> > +static int __devexit spear_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> > +{
> >> > +       struct spear_pwm_chip *pc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >> > +       int i;
> >> > +
> >> > +       if (WARN_ON(!pc))
> >> > +               return -ENODEV;
> >> > +
> >> > +       for (i = 0; i < NUM_PWM; i++) {
> >> > +               struct pwm_device *pwmd = &pc->chip.pwms[i];
> >> > +
> >> > +               if (!test_bit(PWMF_ENABLED, &pwmd->flags))
> 
> One point here: If i am not wrong you want to disable pwmd if it is enabled.
> Shouldn't you check for if (test_bit(PWMF_ENABLED, &pwmd->flags)) instead?
> 

You are right. The code is un-necessarily disabling all pwms while trying to
enable the clock for those which are not enabled also.


> >> > +                       if (clk_prepare_enable(pc->clk) < 0)
> >> > +                               continue;
> >> > +
> >> > +               spear_pwm_writel(pc, i, PWMCR, 0);
> >> > +               clk_disable_unprepare(pc->clk);
> >> > +       }
> >>
> >> You are enabling/disabling clock N times here and each of these will
> >> write to an register. Do something better.
> >>
> >
> > I need to shut down all active pwms, how else would you suggest that ?
> 
> Sorry, i misread the code on the second go :(
> 
> I am proposing something like:
> 
> static int __devexit spear_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
>        struct spear_pwm_chip *pc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>        int i, clk_enabled = 0;
> 
>        if (WARN_ON(!pc))
>                return -ENODEV;
> 
>        for (i = 0; i < NUM_PWM; i++) {
>                struct pwm_device *pwmd = &pc->chip.pwms[i];
> 
>                if (!test_bit(PWMF_ENABLED, &pwmd->flags) && !clk_enabled)
>                        if (clk_prepare_enable(pc->clk) < 0)
>                                continue;
> 		       else
> 			       clk_enabled++;
> 
>                spear_pwm_writel(pc, i, PWMCR, 0);
>        }
> 
>        if (clk_enabled)
> 	       clk_disable_unprepare(pc->clk);
>        ...
> }


It may not be required as pwms which are not enabled do not have
their clocks enabled. Hence, perhaps we can do following,

8<---------------------------
static int spear_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
        struct spear_pwm_chip *pc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
        int i;

        if (WARN_ON(!pc))
                return -ENODEV;

        for (i = 0; i < NUM_PWM; i++) {
                struct pwm_device *pwm = &pc->chip.pwms[i];

                if (test_bit(PWMF_ENABLED, &pwm->flags)) {
                        spear_pwm_writel(pc, i, PWMCR, 0);
                        clk_disable(pc->clk);
                }
        }

        /* clk was prepared in probe, hence unprepare it here */
        clk_unprepare(pc->clk);
        return pwmchip_remove(&pc->chip);
}

---------------------------->8

--
regards
Shiraz 

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-19  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-18 11:28 [PATCH] pwm: add spear pwm driver support Shiraz Hashim
2012-10-18 12:08 ` Thierry Reding
2012-10-18 13:29   ` Shiraz Hashim
2012-10-18 13:42     ` Thierry Reding
2012-10-18 18:05     ` viresh kumar
2012-10-18 17:41 ` viresh kumar
2012-10-19  5:59   ` Shiraz Hashim
2012-10-19  6:02     ` Viresh Kumar
2012-10-19  6:53     ` viresh kumar
2012-10-19  9:43       ` Shiraz Hashim [this message]
2012-10-19  9:45         ` Viresh Kumar
2012-10-19 10:01     ` Shiraz Hashim
2012-10-19 10:08       ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121019094308.GC4185@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=shiraz.hashim@st.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=spear--sw-devel@lists.codex.cro.st.com \
    --cc=spear-devel@list.st.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@avionic-design.de \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.