From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756112Ab2JVT4M (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:56:12 -0400 Received: from mail-da0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:52059 "EHLO mail-da0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755889Ab2JVT4J (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:56:09 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 12:56:06 -0700 From: Greg KH To: MyungJoo Ham Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, cw00.choi@samsung.com, myungjoo.ham@gmail.com Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] extcon fixes for Linux 3.7 Message-ID: <20121022195606.GA13640@kroah.com> References: <1350878680-12164-1-git-send-email-myungjoo.ham@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1350878680-12164-1-git-send-email-myungjoo.ham@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 01:04:40PM +0900, MyungJoo Ham wrote: > Hello Greg, > > > The following changes since commit 6f0c0580b70c89094b3422ba81118c7b959c7556: > > Linux 3.7-rc2 (2012-10-20 12:11:32 -0700) > > are available in the git repository at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mzx/extcon.git for-next This isn't a signed-tag to pull from, it looks just like a branch instead. Is it really a signed tag? If so, it sure didn't work like one. > Axel Lin (4): > extcon: adc-jack: Fix checking return value of request_any_context_irq > extcon: adc-jack: Add missing MODULE_LICENSE > extcon: Fix kerneldoc for extcon_set_cable_state and extcon_set_cable_state_ > extcon: max77693: Use max77693_update_reg for rmw operations > > Chanwoo Choi (1): > extcon: MAX77693: Add platform data for MUIC device to initialize registers > > Devendra Naga (1): > extcon-max8997: remove usage of ret in max8997_muic_handle_charger_type_detach > > Jenny TC (1): > extcon : register for cable interest by cable name > > Peter Huewe (2): > extcon: Unregister compat class at module unload to fix oops > extcon: unregister compat link on cleanup > > Sachin Kamat (2): > extcon: Remove duplicate inclusion of extcon.h header file > extcon: Fix return value in extcon_register_interest() > > anish kumar (5): > extcon: standard cable names definition and declaration changed > extcon: optimising the check_mutually_exclusive function > extcon: checkpatch warning removal Why is a checkpatch cleanup for 3.7? Shouldn't that wait for 3.8? Care to redo this? thanks, greg k-h