From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vms173021pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.21]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TQgD1-0004W9-I7 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:15:59 +0200 Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [108.45.52.73]) by vms173021.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0MCC00NP4MZB5180@vms173021.mailsrvcs.net> for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 09:02:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1FD7C200D7; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:01:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:01:59 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-id: <20121023140159.GA8716@denix.org> References: <7074844.QapBLE5b39@helios> <1564404.2akYnFFVx7@helios> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <1564404.2akYnFFVx7@helios> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: patchwork is up again X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:15:59 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 09:59:19AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Monday 22 October 2012 09:25:45 Khem Raj wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Paul Eggleton > > wrote: > > > On Friday 19 October 2012 16:37:19 Khem Raj wrote: > > >> If you dont use patchwork dont bother but if you do then it had some > > >> hiccups which now has been fixed hopefully. So if you dont see your > > >> latest patch on patchwork resend it. > > > > > > I just sent my hddtemp patch for the third time and it still hasn't been > > > picked up by patchwork, so I'm afraid something is still not working > > > properly. > > > > we have always had issue with large patches. I dont know exact size but > > pw did not parse large emails well. I wonder if your patch is large enough > > to cross the bar. > > I've just posted v2 of the patch which is less than half the size, still no > dice though. > > However, one unusual thing about this patch (and the previous version) is that > git send-email did prompt me for an encoding, I used the default (UTF-8); even > the subject line is encoded. Maybe patchwork doesn't understand UTF-8 - could > that be the reason it's not being picked up? Well, if your patch got uuencoded or base64-encoded, I'd say patchwork might choke on it... -- Denys