From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
andi@firstfloor.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Improve 64 bit __phys_addr call performance
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:25:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121024102533.GA10447@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121009185057.15478.86075.stgit@gitlad.jf.intel.com>
* Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com> wrote:
> This patch is meant to improve overall system performance when
> making use of the __phys_addr call on 64 bit x86 systems. To
> do this I have implemented several changes.
>
> First if CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL is not defined __phys_addr is
> made an inline, similar to how this is currently handled in 32
> bit. However in order to do this it is required to export
> phys_base so that it is available if __phys_addr is used in
> kernel modules.
>
> The second change was to streamline the code by making use of
> the carry flag on an add operation instead of performing a
> compare on a 64 bit value. The advantage to this is that it
> allows us to reduce the overall size of the call. On my Xeon
> E5 system the entire __phys_addr inline call consumes 30 bytes
> and 5 instructions. I also applied similar logic to the debug
> version of the function. My testing shows that the debug
> version of the function with this patch applied is slightly
> faster than the non-debug version without the patch.
>
> Finally, when building the kernel with the first two changes
> applied I saw build warnings about __START_KERNEL_map and
> PAGE_OFFSET constants not fitting in their type. In order to
> resolve the build warning I changed their type from UL to ULL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
> ---
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> arch/x86/kernel/x8664_ksyms_64.c | 3 +++
> arch/x86/mm/physaddr.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
> 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL
> extern unsigned long __phys_addr(unsigned long);
> +#else
> +static inline unsigned long __phys_addr(unsigned long x)
> +{
> + unsigned long y = x - __START_KERNEL_map;
> +
> + /* use the carry flag to determine if x was < __START_KERNEL_map */
> + x = y + ((x > y) ? phys_base : (__START_KERNEL_map - PAGE_OFFSET));
> +
> + return x;
> +}
This is a rather frequently used primitive. By how much does
this patch increase a 'make defconfig' kernel's vmlinux, as
measured via 'size vmlinux'?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-24 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-09 18:50 [PATCH] x86: Improve 64 bit __phys_addr call performance Alexander Duyck
2012-10-10 13:58 ` Andi Kleen
2012-10-10 23:56 ` Alexander Duyck
2012-10-24 10:25 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2012-10-24 16:31 ` Alexander Duyck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121024102533.GA10447@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.