From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758270Ab2JXLUG (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2012 07:20:06 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com ([209.85.212.178]:53046 "EHLO mail-wi0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751644Ab2JXLUE (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2012 07:20:04 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:19:59 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: David Howells Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Provide a comment in uapi/asm/hw_breakpoint.h Message-ID: <20121024111959.GD13010@gmail.com> References: <20121024103559.GB10691@gmail.com> <20121022120558.14413.78980.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <22333.1351077173@warthog.procyon.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <22333.1351077173@warthog.procyon.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * David Howells wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > Just wondering, have the tools/perf/ issues been solved in your > > tree, are the x86 UAPI disintegration changes pullable? > > Did you have a look at the set of five patches I sent? I > think those should fix up perf and building tools with O=, but > I'm not sure whether we want the last two. From commits > already made, I'm guessing that at least patch #4 should be > made. > > Note that the disintegrate-x86 branch does not include any > perf fixes. I can regenerate that with some or all of them, > once I know what they will be. Just wanted to inquire about the current status of it, as I'd rather not pull anything that introduces breakages and is still work in progress. Once it's all sorted out I'll have a look. Arnaldo, what's your take on David's perf Makefile changes? Thanks, Ingo