From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, davem@davemloft.net,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, paulus@samba.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] tools, perf: Fix up for x86 UAPI disintegration
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 21:46:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121024194619.GC17945@liondog.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121024184337.GD13993@ghostprotocols.net>
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:43:37AM -0700, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 05:55:58PM +0100, David Howells escreveu:
> >
> > Here are some potential fix ups for perf and other tools. They need to be
> > applied on top of the x86 UAPI disintegration patch.
>
> Borislav, Namhyung, can you take a look at this series?
Sure.
David, where can get that x86 UAPI disintegration patch?
>
> - Arnaldo
>
> > There are five patches:
> >
> > (1) Use a makefile $(call ...) function in tools/Makefile to make it easier
> > to deal with.
> >
> > [NOTE! I think the rule for selftests_install is wrong since it attempts
> > to discard '_clean' from the end of the target name instead of
> > '_install']
That's right, it should be "...testing/$(@:_install=)" instead. Good catch.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-24 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-19 16:55 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] tools, perf: Fix up for x86 UAPI disintegration David Howells
2012-10-19 16:56 ` [PATCH 1/5] tools: Define a Makefile function to do subdir processing David Howells
2012-10-19 16:56 ` [PATCH 2/5] tools: Honour the O= flag when tool build called from a higher Makefile David Howells
2012-10-26 5:34 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-10-19 16:56 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf: Make perf build for x86 with UAPI disintegration applied David Howells
2012-10-26 5:49 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-10-19 16:56 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: Disintegrate asm/svm.h and asm/vmx.h to produce UAPI components for perf David Howells
2012-10-19 16:56 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86: UAPI Disintegrate asm/perf_regs.h David Howells
2012-10-24 18:43 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/5] tools, perf: Fix up for x86 UAPI disintegration Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-10-24 19:46 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2012-10-25 7:57 ` David Howells
2012-10-26 4:33 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-10-26 6:04 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121024194619.GC17945@liondog.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.