From: Ulrich Weber <ulrich.weber@sophos.com>
To: <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] nf_nat: dont check for port change on ICMP tuples
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:34:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121025153445.GA22403@uweber-WS> (raw)
ICMP tuples have id in src and type/code in dst.
So comparing src.u.all with dst.u.all will always fail here
and ip_xfrm_me_harder() is called for every ICMP packet,
even if there was no NAT...
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Weber <ulrich.weber@sophos.com>
---
net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_nat.c | 4 +++-
net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6table_nat.c | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_nat.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_nat.c
index 9e0ffaf..a820472 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_nat.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_nat.c
@@ -184,7 +184,8 @@ nf_nat_ipv4_out(unsigned int hooknum,
if ((ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.src.u3.ip !=
ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.dst.u3.ip) ||
- (ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.src.u.all !=
+ (ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.dst.protonum != IPPROTO_ICMP &&
+ ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.src.u.all !=
ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.dst.u.all))
if (nf_xfrm_me_harder(skb, AF_INET) < 0)
ret = NF_DROP;
@@ -221,6 +222,7 @@ nf_nat_ipv4_local_fn(unsigned int hooknum,
}
#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
else if (!(IPCB(skb)->flags & IPSKB_XFRM_TRANSFORMED) &&
+ ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.dst.protonum != IPPROTO_ICMP &&
ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.dst.u.all !=
ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.src.u.all)
if (nf_xfrm_me_harder(skb, AF_INET) < 0)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6table_nat.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6table_nat.c
index e418bd6..d57dab1 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6table_nat.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6table_nat.c
@@ -186,7 +186,8 @@ nf_nat_ipv6_out(unsigned int hooknum,
if (!nf_inet_addr_cmp(&ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.src.u3,
&ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.dst.u3) ||
- (ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.src.u.all !=
+ (ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.dst.protonum != IPPROTO_ICMPV6 &&
+ ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.src.u.all !=
ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.dst.u.all))
if (nf_xfrm_me_harder(skb, AF_INET6) < 0)
ret = NF_DROP;
@@ -222,6 +223,7 @@ nf_nat_ipv6_local_fn(unsigned int hooknum,
}
#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
else if (!(IP6CB(skb)->flags & IP6SKB_XFRM_TRANSFORMED) &&
+ ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.dst.protonum != IPPROTO_ICMPV6 &&
ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.dst.u.all !=
ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.src.u.all)
if (nf_xfrm_me_harder(skb, AF_INET6))
--
1.7.9.5
next reply other threads:[~2012-10-25 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-25 15:34 Ulrich Weber [this message]
2012-10-28 22:49 ` [PATCH] nf_nat: dont check for port change on ICMP tuples Pablo Neira Ayuso
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-31 12:13 Ulrich Weber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121025153445.GA22403@uweber-WS \
--to=ulrich.weber@sophos.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.