From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] w83627ehf: Wrong values reported after resuming from suspend/hibernation
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:07:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121025210736.3179eba8@endymion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50856051.5070803@gmx.at>
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:26:45 +0200, Harald Judt wrote:
> Am 24.10.2012 21:23, schrieb Jean Delvare:
> > To be really sure, it would be good if you could set arbitrary non-zero
> > limits to in1, in4, in5 etc. otherwise we can't be sure these limits
> > have been restored either.
>
> Good idea. Here is the corresponding part of my adjusted
> /etc/sensors3.conf file:
>
> chip "w83627ehf-*" "w83627dhg-*" "w83667hg-*" "nct6775-*" "nct6776-*"
>
> label in0 "Vcore"
> label in2 "AVCC"
> label in3 "+3.3V"
> label in7 "3VSB"
> label in8 "Vbat"
>
> set in0_min 0.5 * 1.00
> set in0_max 2.0 * 1.00
> set in1_min 1.6 * 1.00
> set in1_max 1.95 * 1.00
> set in2_min 2.0 * 1.00
> set in2_max 3.5 * 1.00
> set in3_min 2.0 * 1.00
> set in3_max 3.5 * 1.00
> set in4_min 0.8 * 1.00
> set in4_max 1.2 * 1.00
> set in5_min 1.5 * 1.00
> set in5_max 1.95 * 1.00
> set in7_min 2.0 * 1.00
> set in7_max 3.5 * 1.00
> set in8_min 2.0 * 1.00
> set in8_max 3.5 * 1.00
>
> There are some limits for min/max values, e.g. in5_max will get reset to
> 2.04 if you try to use a higher value. Therefore I've set it to 0.95 to
> avoid any confusion.
>
> So, here are the results after sensors -s:
>
> nct6776-isa-0290
> Adapter: ISA adapter
> Vcore: +0.96 V (min = +0.50 V, max = +2.00 V)
> in1: +1.84 V (min = +1.60 V, max = +1.95 V)
> AVCC: +3.34 V (min = +2.00 V, max = +3.50 V)
> +3.3V: +3.34 V (min = +2.00 V, max = +3.50 V)
> in4: +1.05 V (min = +0.80 V, max = +1.20 V)
> in5: +1.68 V (min = +1.50 V, max = +1.95 V)
> 3VSB: +3.47 V (min = +2.00 V, max = +3.50 V)
> Vbat: +3.31 V (min = +2.00 V, max = +3.50 V)
>
> And after resume:
> nct6776-isa-0290
> Adapter: ISA adapter
> Vcore: +0.96 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +1.74 V)
> in1: +1.84 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM
> AVCC: +3.34 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM
> +3.3V: +3.34 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM
> in4: +1.05 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM
> in5: +1.68 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM
> 3VSB: +3.47 V (min = +2.00 V, max = +3.50 V)
> Vbat: +3.31 V (min = +2.00 V, max = +3.50 V)
>
> Apparently, in0-in5 do not get restored, only in7 and in8 do. There is
> no in6 on this chip (verified by looking in /sys/class/hwmon).
I don't get it. I have double checked my code and I don't see how this
is possible. Plus Guenter's testing was successful...
Are you 100% certain that the above test was with my driver and not the
one shipping with your distribution kernel?
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-25 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-22 15:03 [lm-sensors] w83627ehf: Wrong values reported after resuming from suspend/hibernation Harald Judt
2012-10-22 21:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-10-23 7:14 ` Jean Delvare
2012-10-23 9:57 ` Harald Judt
2012-10-23 11:45 ` Jean Delvare
2012-10-23 12:08 ` Harald Judt
2012-10-23 12:34 ` Jean Delvare
2012-10-23 14:01 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-10-23 16:32 ` Jean Delvare
2012-10-23 19:02 ` Harald Judt
2012-10-24 3:45 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-10-24 8:39 ` Jean Delvare
2012-10-24 18:05 ` Harald Judt
2012-10-24 18:14 ` Harald Judt
2012-10-24 19:23 ` Jean Delvare
2012-10-25 9:53 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-10-25 17:26 ` Harald Judt
2012-10-25 19:07 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2012-10-25 19:16 ` Harald Judt
2012-10-25 20:37 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-10-25 23:49 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-10-26 0:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-10-26 0:55 ` Harald Judt
2012-10-26 7:27 ` Jean Delvare
2012-10-26 14:06 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-10-26 14:15 ` Jean Delvare
2013-07-28 20:43 ` Harald Judt
2013-07-28 21:43 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-07-28 22:28 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-07-29 2:24 ` Harald Judt
2013-07-29 2:47 ` Harald Judt
2013-07-29 6:58 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-07-29 9:12 ` Harald Judt
2013-07-29 15:27 ` Harald Judt
2013-07-29 22:46 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-07-31 22:11 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-01 9:08 ` Harald Judt
2013-08-01 13:42 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-01 14:36 ` Harald Judt
2013-08-01 17:46 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121025210736.3179eba8@endymion.delvare \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.