All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dimitris Papastamos <dp@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 v2] firmware: Add /proc/firmware_path entry to list the firmware paths
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:07:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121026100731.GA10468@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121025184833.GA22114@kroah.com>

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:48:33AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 01:52:55PM +0100, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> > This patch provides the aforementioned procfs file that lists
> > the default firmware paths that are used during firmware lookup.
> > 
> > The file contains a white space separated list of paths.
> 
> Paths can have whitespaces :(
> 
> How about using the "universal" path seperator of ':' that shells are
> used to using?  Yeah, it gets messy if you have a ':' in a path, but
> from what I can tell, only the openSUSE build system does looney things
> like that.

Sure I can do that, however, could you comment on Ming's comments?  Is
this patchset something we find useful at the moment as regards listing
and/or updating the firmware path list.

> > There will be another patch on top of this that adds the functionality
> > to modify the paths at runtime.
> 
> Did I miss that patch somewhere?

That patch is here:
	http://opensource.wolfsonmicro.com/~dp/patches/firmware/0004-firmware-Add-write-support-to-proc-fw_path.patch

However I've not rebased that patch on top of linux-next and I did not
send it for review as it seems that it may be a more sensible solution
to pass this as a kernel parameter.

Let me know what you think and I'll squeeze some time this weekend
to look at this.

Thanks,
Dimitris

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-26 10:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-23 12:52 [PATCH 0/3 v2] Expose firmware paths via procfs Dimitris Papastamos
2012-10-23 12:52 ` [PATCH 1/3 v2] firmware: Convert firmware path setup from an array to a list Dimitris Papastamos
2012-10-23 13:08   ` Ming Lei
2012-10-23 13:29     ` Dimitris Papastamos
2012-10-23 13:37       ` Ming Lei
2012-10-23 13:44         ` Dimitris Papastamos
2012-10-23 14:37           ` Ming Lei
2012-10-23 12:52 ` [PATCH 2/3 v2] firmware: Add /proc/firmware_path entry to list the firmware paths Dimitris Papastamos
2012-10-25 18:48   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-10-26 10:07     ` Dimitris Papastamos [this message]
2012-10-26 23:56       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-10-23 12:52 ` [PATCH 3/3 v2] firmware: Factor out code to add paths to the firmware path list Dimitris Papastamos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121026100731.GA10468@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --to=dp@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.